Effects of straw mulching and nitrogen application rates on crop yields, fertilizer use efficiency, and greenhouse gas emissions of summer maize
Zhaoxin Li,Qiuying Zhang,Zhao Li,Yunfeng Qiao,Kun Du,Chao Tian,Nong Zhu,Peifang Leng,Zewei Yue,Hefa Cheng,Gang Chen,Fadong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157681
2022-08-03
Abstract:Although straw mulching and nitrogen applications are extensively practiced in the agriculture sector, large uncertainties remain about their impacts on crop yields and especially the environment. The responses of summer maize yields, fertilizer use efficiency, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) in the North China Plain (NCP) to two straw management practices (S0: no straw and S1: straw mulching) and two nitrogen application rates (N1: 180 and N2: 210 kg N ha −1 ) were investigated in field tests in 2018, 2019, and 2020. The highest yields and partial factor productivity (PFP) were obtained by S1N1, followed by S1N2, S0N1, and S0N2. S1N2 had the highest CO 2 emissions and greatest CH 4 uptake, S0N1 had the lowest CO 2 emissions, and S0N2 had the smallest CH 4 uptake. The highest and lowest N 2 O emissions were found in S0N1 and S1N1, respectively. The S1N2 treatment, an extensively applied practice, had the greatest global warming potential (GWP), which was 70.3 % larger than S1N1 and two times more than S0N1 and S0N2. The largest GHG emission intensity (GHGI) of 19.4 was found in the S1N2 treatment, while the other three treatments, S0N1, S0N2, and S1N1, had a GHGI of 10.1, 10.7, and 10.7, respectively according to three tested results. In conclusion, S1N1 treatment achieved a better trade-off between crop yields and GHG emissions of summer maize in NCP.
environmental sciences