Abstract:Root canal therapy is a crucial procedure in endodontics that is done to achieve complete obliteration of the root canal space. The success of this therapy depends on achieving a proper seal, which is facilitated using root canal sealers. This study aimed to compare the apical sealing ability of three different root canal sealers: MTA Fillapex, AH Plus, and zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), using the dye penetration method. Forty freshly extracted single-rooted human maxillary incisors were collected and prepared for the study. The root canals were instrumented using the ProTaper system, and the canals were then obturated using the lateral condensation technique with the respective sealers. After one week of storage, the samples were coated with nail varnish, immersed in a rhodamine B dye solution, and then sectioned longitudinally. The depth of dye penetration was measured, and the results were analyzed statistically. The results revealed significant differences in apical leakage among the three experimental groups. Group 2 (AH Plus) showed the minimum leakage with a mean of 0.13 mm, while Group 4 (no sealer) exhibited the maximum leakage with a mean of 4.49 mm. Group 3 (ZOE) showed an intermediate level of leakage with a mean of 2.37 mm. The statistical analysis confirmed the significant difference in mean leakage among the groups. The findings of this study indicate that AH Plus exhibited superior apical sealing ability compared to MTA Fillapex and ZOE. AH Plus is a resin-based sealer known for its dimensional stability. On the other hand, MTA Fillapex, a newly introduced sealer containing mineral trioxide aggregate, resin, and silica, showed promising sealing properties but had slightly higher leakage compared to AH Plus. ZOE, a traditional sealer, demonstrated relatively higher leakage than the other sealers. In conclusion, choosing a root canal sealer is crucial in achieving a successful endodontic treatment outcome. AH Plus demonstrated superior apical sealing ability among the three sealers tested. Further research and long-term clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess the impact of sealer choice on treatment outcomes and post-endodontic healing.

Root Canal Sealers Induce Cytotoxicity and Necrosis

Chemical, Antibacterial, and Cytotoxic Properties of Four Different Endodontic Sealer Leachates Over Time

[Effect of Root Canal Sealers on Biocompatibility of Human Periodontal Ligament Cells].

Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using Warm Vertical Compaction with Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer

Effect of three different root canal sealants on human dental pulp stem cells

In vitro genotoxicity of root canal sealers

Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers

Evaluation of cytotoxicity and up-regulation of gelatinases in human fibroblast cells by four root canal sealers

In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Calcium Silicate–containing Endodontic Sealers

Impact of various endodontic sealers on HPDLF Cell viability and apoptosis

In vitro antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

A Comprehensive Review of the Sealing Abilities of Various Root Canal Sealers

In vitro studies on the cytotoxic potential of surface sealants

Physical Properties of 5 Root Canal Sealers

Comparative Cytocompatibility and Mineralization Potential of Bio-C Sealer and TotalFill BC Sealer

Physicochemical Properties of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers

Periapical reactions to calcium hydroxide-containing sealers and AH 26 in monkeys

Cytotoxicity of endodontic sealers after one year of aging in vitro

Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: A comparative study