CAN AUSTRALIAN AND ASIAN IRRIGATION AREAS BE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE AND RETAIN THEIR ECONOMIC VIABILITY?

Shahbaz Khan,Rana Tariq,Cui Yuanlai,J. Blackwell

2004-01-01

Abstract:Globally, about 10 million ha of agricultural land are lost annually due to salinisation of which about 1.5 million ha are irrigated. While some climate and management aspects are common to semi-arid regions the detailed mechanisms and options to secure ecological sustainability and economic viability may vary considerably from case to case. This paper applies a whole of the system water balance approach to compare irrigation in three semi-arid regions suffering from similar sustainability issues: the Rechna Doab (RD) in Pakistan, the Liu Yuan Kou Irrigation Area (LIA) in China and the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (MIA) in Australia. Soil salinity, lack of adequate water resources and groundwater management are major issues in these areas. The MIA and LIA irrigation systems also suffer from soil salinity and water use efficiency issues. These similarities occur in spite of very different climatic and underlying hydrogeological conditions. The key data used to compare these different regions are climate and soils, available water resources and their use, as well as components of the water balance. Furthermore, the history of water resource development in these areas is examined to understand how salinity problems emerge in semi-arid regions and the consequences for production. Based on the efficiency parameters and the definitions of sustainability, approaches to solve common environmental problems are explored to maintain economic viability and environmental sustainability for irrigation systems. HISTORIC IRRIGATION SUSTAINABILITY PROBLEMS For 6000 years irrigation has been important for agricultural production in Mesopotamia (parts of present day Iraq and Iran). Mesopotamia has low rainfall and is supplied with surface water by two major rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. The plains of Mesopotamia are very flat and poorly drained and the region has always had problems with poor drainage of soils, drought, catastrophic flooding, silting and soil salinity. Although Mesopotamia is very flat, the bed of the Euphrates is higher than that of the Tigris - in fact, Euphrates floods sometimes found their way across country into the Tigris. Engineers used this gradient as soon as irrigation schemes became large enough, using the Euphrates water as the supply, and the Tigris channel as a drain. The main engineering problems for earlier civilisations were water storage, flood control and maintenance of canals. The salinity problem was more subtle, not fully appreciated and could not be overcome by the engineering available at the time. It was difficult to drain water off the fields and there was always a tendency for salt to build up in the soil. The problems of irrigated agriculture in Mesopotamia can be summarised as: * Silting of canals: silt used to build up quickly in the canal beds threatening to block them * Soil salinity: recorded evidence around 2000 BC, 1100 BC, and after 1200 AD * Water politics: arising from tension between upstream and downstream users. In Sumeria, the city of Lagash was far downstream in the Euphrates canal system. Apparently the governor of Lagash decided that he would cut a canal to tap Tigris water rather than rely on water from the Euphrates, but the addition of poor-quality water from the Tigris led to rapid salinisation of the soil. * Over exploitation of resources: After the wave of Moslem expansion overtook Mesopotamia, the Abassid Caliphate was based on Baghdad from 762 AD until its demise in 1258. Existing irrigation schemes were renovated and greatly extended in very large projects. Abassid engineers drew water from the Euphrates at five separate points and led it in parallel canals across the plains, watering a huge area south of Baghdad. This system provided the basis for the enormously rich culture of Baghdad, which is still remembered in legend (Scheherezade, the Caliph of Baghdad, and the Arabian Nights) as well as history. But it required high level physical maintenance and there was increasing salinisation in the south. * Institutional failure: As central government began to fail in the 12th century (mostly from extravagant overspending), the canals became silt-choked, the irrigation system deteriorated, and the lands became more salinised. The deathblow to the system was aided by nature - massive floods about 1200 AD shifted the courses of both the Tigris and the Euphrates, cutting off most of the water supply to the Nahrwan Canal and