Abstract:Background Acute penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) are reported to dynamically evolve into different clinical outcomes ranging from regression to aortic rupture, but no practice guidelines are available in China. Methods and Results All 109 patients with acute PAUs were monitored clinically. At 30 days follow‐up, 31 patients (28.44%) suffered from aortic‐related adverse events, a composite of aortic‐related mortality, aortic dissection, or an enlarged ulcer. In addition, 7 (6.42%) patients had clinically related adverse events, including all‐cause mortality, cerebral stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, acute heart failure alone or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure, acute renal failure, arrhythmia, and bleeding events. In the present study, the intervention criteria for the Chinese PAU population included a PAU diameter of 12.5 mm and depth of 9.5 mm. The multivariate analysis showed that an ulcer diameter >12.5 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 3.846; 95% CI, 1.561–9.476; P =0.003) and an ulcer depth >9.5 mm (HR, 3.359; 95% CI, 1.505–7.494; P =0.003) were each independent predictors of aortic‐related events. Conclusions Patients with acute PAUs were at high risk for aortic‐related adverse events and clinically related adverse events within 30 days after onset. Patients with an ulcer diameter >12.5 mm or an ulcer depth >9.5 mm have a higher risk for disease progression, and early intervention may be recommended. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms AAS acute aortic syndrome AD aortic dissection EVAR endovascular repair PAUs penetrating aortic ulcers Clinical Perspective What Is New? The first penetrating aortic ulcer intervention criteria for the Chinese patients were 12.5 mm for ulcer diameter and 9.5 mm for ulcer depth. What Are the Clinical Implications? Patients with acute penetrating aortic ulcers were at high risk for aortic‐related adverse events and clinically related adverse events within 30 days after onset. Patients with an ulcer diameter >12.5 mm or an ulcer depth >9.5 mm have a higher risk for disease progression, and early intervention may be recommended. In aortic diseases, both penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) and aortic dissection (AD) are classified as acute aortic syndrome (AAS). 1 PAUs account for 2% to 7% of AAS cases and may deteriorate to AD, aneurysm formation, and aortic rupture. 2 The etiology of the PAU is not clear and may be related to an atheromatous plaque that disrupts the internal elastic lamina without a false lumen. 3 The PAU, a special type of AAS 4 that is similar to AD and intramural hematoma in terms of its clinical manifestation, has unique pathological features and clinical outcomes that are different from those of other types of AAS. 5 Furthermore, the long‐term evolution of the PAU is unclear. The American guidelines recommend endovascular repair (EVAR) for asymptomatic PAU (III C) and symptomatic PAU (II b C). 6 The European guidelines recognize PAU as a type of AAS with a surgical indication (II b C). For type B PAU, the European guidelines suggest medical treatment (I C), but complicated type B PAU may be considered for EVAR (II a C) or surgery (II b C). 7 There are only a few case reports of PAUs, and the amount of detailed, large‐scale, real‐world clinical data reported for Chinese patients with PAUs is small. Thus, the present study aims to examine the imaging characteristics and clinical prognoses of PAUs and to explore the predictors of aortic‐related adverse events in cases of acute PAUs. METHODS This study was a non‐interventional retrospective and observational clinical data analysis study. It has been reviewed and approved by the eth -Abstract Truncated-

Management of penetrating aortic ulcer

Outcome of Endovascular and Open Treated Penetrating Aortic Ulcers

Demystifying penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of aorta: unrealised tyrant of senile aortic changes

Endovascular Repair of Penetrating Aortic Ulcers: Indications and Single-Center Mid-Term Results

Abdominal Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and Endovascular Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endovascular Treatment of a Contained Rupture of a Penetrating Aortic Ulcer in a Young Patient

A Case of Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer Treated With Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Outcomes of endovascular stent graft repair for penetrating aortic ulcers with or without intramural hematoma

Natural history of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers in aortic branch vessels

Isolated Ruptured Paravisceral Penetrating Aortic Ulcers

Long-Term Imaging Evolution and Clinical Prognosis Among Patients With Acute Penetrating Aortic Ulcers: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Endovascular treatment of penetrating ulcers of the paraceliac aorta using fenestrated endografts

Primary Aorto-Appendicular Fistula Accompanied by Infected Penetrating Aortic Ulcer - Case Report

Midterm results of complicated penetrating abdominal aortic ulcer treated by aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization

Commentary on andquot;Outcomes of Endovascular Stent Graft Repair for Penetrating Aortic Ulcers with or without Intramural Hematomaandquot;

Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

The challenge of associated intramural hematoma with endovascular repair for penetrating ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of penetrating thoracic aortic ulcer:analysis of 7 cases and literature review

[Endovascular stent-graft repair for penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the descending aorta]

Surgical Treatment of Post-Traumatic Pseudoaneurysms and Arteriovenous Fistulas

Medical and Surgical Management of a Descending Aorta Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer and Associated Ascending Intramural Hematoma