The value of comparing R/S wave amplitude transition and lead V_2 R-wave amplitude ratio in distinguishing the origins from right and left ventricular outflow of ventricular arrhythmias

LIANG Yan-chun,WEI Hui-na,LI Shi-bei,JIN Zhi-qing,LIANG Ming,YANG Gui-tang,YU Hai-bo,LI Ya-ping,GUAN Yue,WANG Zu-lu,HAN Ya-ling
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of comparing R/S wave amplitude transition and lead V2 R-wave amplitude ratio during sinus ryhthm( SR) and outflow tract arrythmia( OTA) in distinguishing the origins from right and left ventricular outflow tract of ventricular arrhythmias. Methods ECG characteristics were retrospectively analyzed in 208 consecutive patients with left or right ventricular outflow tract( LVOT or RVOT) arrhythmia origin confirmed by successful radiofrequency catheter ablation. R / S transition lead was checked in every patient. OTA origin was judged as from LVOT if R / S transition occured before lead V3 and from RVOT if R / S transition occured after lead V3. Lead V2 R-wave amplitude ratios were compared during SR and OTA if R / S transition occured at lead V3 lead. OTA origin was judged from LVOT if lead V2 's transition ratio during OTA was more than 1. 0. The specificity and sensitivity of each method was calculated. Results There were 76 men with OTA and the mean age was 43. 6 ± 13. 8 year-old in 208 patients. OTAs were successfully ablated from RVOT in 181 patients and from LVOT in 27 patients. There were 18 cases with OTA morphology of R / S transition before lead V3 and the OTA origins were located at LVOT in 17 patients. The criterion of R / S transition before lead V3 for judgment of OTA origin from LVOT were with the specificity of 99. 5% and the sensitivity of 63. 0%. There were 112 cases with OTA morphology of R / S transition after lead V3 and OTA origins were from RVOT in all these patients. The criterion of R / S transition after lead V3 for prediction of OTA origin from RVOT were with the specificity of 100% and the sensitivity of 61. 9%. There were 78 cases with OTA morphology of R / S transition in lead V3 and the OTA origins were located at LVOT in 10 patients and at RVOT in 68 patients. V2 's transition ratio of OTA with LVOT origin was larger than that of OTA with RVOT origin( 1. 32 ± 0. 26 vs. 0. 52 ± 0. 20,P < 0. 05). In patients with OTA morphology of R / S transition in lead V3,if V2 's transition ratio greater than 1. 0 was the criterion of the judgment of OTA origin from LVOT,the specificity would be 94. 2% and the sensitivity would be 80. 0%. However,if V2 's transition ratio greater than 0. 6 was the criterion of the judgment of OTA origin from LVOT,the specificity would be 66. 2% and the sensitivity would be 100%. In these 78 cases with OTA morphology of R / S transition in lead V3,there were 22 patients with SR morphology of R/S transition in lead V2 and OTA was originated from RVOT in all these 22 patients. If OTA morphology of R / S transition in lead V3 and SR morphology of R / S transition in lead V2 was the criterion of the judgment of OTA origin from RVOT,the specificity would be 100% and the sensitivity would be 32. 4%. Conclusions The specificities and sensitivities of the criterion of identifying the origin of OTA from LVOT by R / S transition before lead V3 and the criterion of identifying the origin of OTA from RVOT by R / S transition after lead V3 were both high. In patients with R / S wave transition in lead V3,V2 's transition ratio played an important role in locating the origin of OTA. Setting lead V2 's transition ratio ≥1. 0 as a criterion for predicting OTA origin from LVOT was more accurate than setting V2 's transition ratio ≥0. 6 as a criterion in this group of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?