Abstract:Judgments of the orientations of 2D lines show systematic biases that can be described as exaggerating deviations from horizontal. These biases are not due to numeric estimation biases. An orientation of about 37° from horizontal is judged to be equidistant from horizontal and vertical. The same orientation is judged to be 45° from horizontal and 45° from vertical. One hypothesis concerning this distortion is an experience-based anisotropy in the distribution of orientation sensitive cells in visual cortex. An alternative view is that these biases are intrinsic to the encoding of spatial orientation. To tease apart these two possibilities we oriented observers at 45° from vertical and asked them to do two kinds of tasks. One task was a psychometric measurement of perceived vertical or horizontal using a forced choice method. Judgments of visual stimuli, presented in a circular aperture that removed any external visual references, were made either with respect to an egocentric (bodily) or exocentric (gravitational) reference frame. Over 150 participants were tested. Both within and between subjects, variability was much less for judgments made with respect to the exocentric (perceived gravitational) reference frame. Similarly, when required to make numeric estimates of orientation with respect to the two types of reference frame, estimates with respect to perceived gravitational frames exhibited the standard bias exaggerating deviations from horizontal. Estimates with respect to bodily frames did not. These findings are consistent with the precedence of gravitational reference frames in visual experience and imply that 2D orientation asymmetries between horizontal and vertical are not caused simply by biases in the distribution of early cortical orientation analyzers. Precision was greatest when observers were upright so that gravitational and bodily vertical were aligned, but for tilted observers, judgments made with respect to gravitational reference frames were most similar to judgments made upright. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

An Eye Movement Research on the External Reference Frame of Mental Rotation

Exocentric Reference Frames Determine 2D Orientation Bias

Eye movements during mental rotation of nonmirrored and mirrored three-dimensional abstract objects

An Improved Spherical Coordinate System Applied in Oculomotor System-the Possibility for Rapid Strabismus Diagnosis

The roles of symmetry and elongation in developing reference frames

Spatiotemporal differences of brain activation between internal and external strategies in mental rotation: A behavioral and ERD/ERS study.

The impact of presentation modes on mental rotation processing: a comparative analysis of eye movements and performance

The Role of Cognitive Factors in the Rod-and-Frame Effect

Virtual Reflections on a Dynamic 2D Eye Model Improve Spatial Reference Identification

Attentional Reference Frames in Perifoveal and Peripheral Visual Field.

An Eye Movement Study of Cognitive Style Effect to the Recognition Performance of Irregular Geometrical Figures

Shifts in the Eye-Centered Frame of Reference May Underlie Saccades, Visual Perception, and Eye-Hand Coordination

Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation: A replication

Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space

Electrophysiological evidences for the rotational uncertainty effect in the hand mental rotation: an ERP and ERS/ERD study.

Respective Contribution of Orientation Contrast and Illusion of Self-Tilt to the Rod-And-Frame Effect

Effects of Stimulus Views on Mental Rotation of Hands: an Event-Related Potential Study

Eye Movement Variations in Indoor, Outdoor, and Reading Scenarios and their Implications for Myopia

Self-reference modulates the perception of visual apparent motion

[The Progress of Fixation Eye Movement Research].

EXPRESS: Eye Movement Differences when Recognising and Learning Moving and Static Faces