Comparison of scaffolds for chondrocyte implantation with two kinds of cross-linking agents

QI Hui,JIE Yong-sheng,CHEN Lei,TAO Jian-feng,JIANG Jian,SUN Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/cmba.j.issn.1673-713X.2013.06.002
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective Repair of focal articular cartilage defect may be solved by autologous chondrocyte implantation. Preparation of proper scaffold is one of the most important problems to be solved. We are to construct scaffolds for their application in repairing cartilage defect of animal model with two kinds of cross-linking agents. Methods Acellular dermal matrices(ADM) were divided into two groups. One group was treated with 0.05% glutaraldehyde for 2 hours for cross-linking and the other was treated with 0.2% self-made cross-linking agent. Cytotoxity and hemolysis were tested with MTT method. Porosity was examined with liquid discharge method. Mesenchymal stem cells were used for cell adhesion test, and both scaffolds were implanted into SD rats for biocompatibility test. The structure of two kinds of scaffolds was observed under electron microscope. Results Both of the cytotoxicity and hemolysis of two kinds of scaffolds fitted the national standards. And the porocity of scaffold cross-linked with glutaraldehyde and with self-made cross-linking agent were 79.7% ± 10.8% and 84.3% ± 5.0%, respectively, and there exists no significant difference between the two kinds(P > 0.05). But the biocompatibility of scaffold cross-linked with glutaraldehyde was poorer than that of scaffold cross-linked with self-made agent. According to the results of cell adhesion test, mesenchymal stem cells adhered to the scaffold treated with self-made agent perfectly, but did not adhere to the one treated with glutaraldehyde well. Conclusion The scaffold treated with self-made agent exerts little cytotoxicity, but possesses good biocompatibility, porosity, and cell adhesion. Thus it will be a proper choice for repairing cartilage defect in the future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?