Abstract:With the gradual deepening of China's judicial reform, the revision of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law is on going. It is necessary to reform the existing public prosecution system to make the criminal prosecution ruled by the law further. The reform of our public prosecution system must have the following three important aspects. Firstly, the exclusionary rule should be put into practice. In the process of examination and prosecution, the establishment of the exclusionary procedure has an important effect on improving the value of procedural justice, eliminating the illegal evidence from the trial process, and avoiding the occurrence of miscarriages of justice. It is an important feature of Chinese prosecution system that the procuratorial organ has a duty to exclude illegal evidence in the process of examination and prosecution. Secondly, the conditional non—prosecution system should be established. Compared to the doctrine of prosecutive discretion, the doctrine of conditional non—prosecution is more important and favored by many countries and districts. It should also be recognized by the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law to carry out the criminal policy of tempering justice with mercy, maintain the modesty of the criminal law, reflect the economy of litigation, and promote social harmony and stability. Legislation should confirm reasonably the scope and the test period of the conditional non—prosecution system. Thirdly, the sentencing suggestion system should be created. As an important part of the prosecution system, the sentencing suggestion system has considerable universality in today's criminal justice practice in the world and should also be adopted by our country. It helps to achieve the justice of sentence and the effectiveness of defense, and can improve the efficiency, capacity and level of public prosecution. We must build a scientific and feasible operative mechanism to make sure the sentencing suggestion system, an innovative reform initiative, has maximum effect in the administration of justice.

Study on the Initiation System of Forensic Identification in Criminal Action

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

The Chinese Model of the Forensic Authentication’s Main Pattern——Take Criminal Procedure Law as Model

The Discussion on the Current Situation and the Future Reform Direction of the Chinese Forensic Medical Judicial Identification System

Study on Problems in Forensic DNA Identification Standardization in China and Countermeasures for the Same

Thoughts on Perfecting the Chinese Criminal Identification System

The status and problems of forensic identiifcation standards

Study on Compulsory Forensic Appraisal in Criminal Procedure

Adverse Effects of Setting-up a Forensic Institute Within the Investigation Agency

The Restatement of Investigative Interrogation in Our Country under the Background of the New Criminal Procedure Law

Standardization research on forensic biological evidence identiifcation in China

Research on the Reform of China's Public Prosecution System

Field research report on the important problems of criminal evidence system

The Relationship of Forensic Science,Criminal Identification and Judicial Expertise

On the Preliminary Investigation Before Filing the Criminal Case

Reforming the Initiation Procedure of Evaluating Mental Illness in Criminal Action——With the perspective of positive analysis

New Developments and New Expectations of the System of Criminal Judicial Appraisal in China

On Improving the Authority of Forensic Conclusions-In the View of Criminal Proceedings

Restructuring Personal Injury Authentication System

Study on Law Control of Forensic Materials Collection Process