Abstract:This dissertation studies the importance of firm-level price markup dynamics for business cycle fluctuations. In chapter one, I use recent IO techniques to measure the behavior of markups over the business cycle at the firm level. I find that markups are countercyclical with an average elasticity of -0.9 with respect to real GDP, in line with the earlier industrylevel evidence. Importantly, I find substantial heterogeneity in markup cyclicality across firms, with small firms having significantly more countercyclical markups than large firms. In chapter two, I examine if two prominent models in the literature are consistent with the empirical findings. First, I explore the Atkeson and Burstein (2008) model of oligopolistic competition. Coupled with an exogenous second-moment shock to firm productivities, this model results in a countercyclical average markup, but predicts that smaller firms reduce their markups in recessions. Second, I calibrate both Calvo and menu cost models of price stickiness to match the empirical heterogeneity in price durations as in Goldberg and Hellerstein (2011). I find that both models can match the average counter-cyclicality of markups in response to monetary shocks. Quantitatively, however, only the menu cost model, through its selection e↵ect, can match the extent of the empirical heterogeneity in markup cyclicality. In addition, both sticky price models imply pro-cyclical markup behavior in response to productivity shocks. In chapter three, I develop a new general equilibrium model that embeds customer capital into a standard firm dynamics model with entry and exit. A key feature of the model is that a firm’s decision about markups becomes dynamic – firms accumulate customer capital in the periods of fast growth by charging low markups, and choose to exploit it by charging high markups in the downturns. In particular, during recessions, the endogenous higher exit probability for smaller firms implies that they place lower weight on future profits, leading them to charge higher markups. This mechanism serves to endogenously increase the dispersion of firm sales and employment in recessions. Also, the resulting input misallocation iii amplifies both the volatility and persistence of the exogenous productivity shocks driving the business cycle.

On the Cyclicality of R&D

On the Cyclicality of R&D: Disaggregated Evidence

Pro-cyclical Aggregate R&D: A Comovement Phenomenon

1 R & D , Liquidity Constraint , and the Schumpeterian View

R&D Heterogeneity and Countercyclical Productivity Dispersion

An Empirical Examination of the Procyclicality of R&D Investment and Innovation

Investment Cycles

Understanding the inventory cycle

The Cyclical and Nonlinear Impact of R&D and Innovation Activities on Economic Growth in OECD Economies: a New Perspective

R&D Investment along the Firm Life-Cycle: New Evidence from High-Tech Industries

Understanding the Inventory Cycle I. Partial Equilibrium Analysis∗

Public R&D and Growth: A dynamic Panel Vector-Error-Correction Model Analysis for 14 OECD Countries

On the Nature Reasons for the Long-Term Non-Linearity of Economic Development

The Cyclical Behavior of Factor Shares

What Does It Take to Explain Procyclical Productivity?

A Growth Model with Endogenous Technological Revolutions and Cycles

Capital Demand Driven Business Cycles: Mechanism and Effects

Modeling Long Cycles

Riskiness Choice and Endogenous Productivity Dispersion over the Business Cycle

Dynamic Analysis of Research and Development Input and Economic Growth

Cyclicality and Heterogeneity of Price Markup