Abstract:The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Endoscopic Adenoidectomy with Microdebrider over Conventional technique by Curettage using Impedance Audiometry findings. In this prospective, randomised, comparative study patients were divided into two groups to undergo one of the above adenoidectomy surgeries. Patients with symptoms of Adenoid hypertrophy after failed maximal medical therapy (12 weeks) were selected after due consideration of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline Impedance Audiometric assessment was done one week prior to surgery which was compared to Impedance Audiometric values 12 weeks post operatively in each group. This study enrolled 50 patients with adenoid hypertrophy, 25 patients of group A underwent Conventional adenoidectomy and the other 25 patients of group B underwent Endoscopic Adenoidectomy with Microdebrider. Significant difference in type of tympanogram before and after adenoidectomy was found in both the groups (p = 0.0008 in group A & p < 0.0001 in group B). In Group A Percentage of abnormal tympanograms becoming normal (Type A), 12 weeks after adenoidectomy was 80%. In Group B Percentage of abnormal tympanograms becoming normal (Type A), 12 weeks after adenoidectomy was 88%. A statistically significant improvement (p < 0.0001 in both the groups) in the percentage of ears with absent stapedial reflex was observed in both groups postoperatively, with no difference between the two groups suggestive of improvement in eustachian tube function. Association of Preoperatively & Postoperatively Eustachian tube function in each group undergoing adenoidectomy was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Both forms of adenoidectomy are effective in managing adenoid hypertrophy with tubal dysfunction causing mild conductive hearing loss and prone for OME. However, the audiological and endoscopic evaluation seems to favor Endoscopic Adenoidectomy with microdebrider over conventional adenoidectomy, and it should be therefore considered in the therapeutic management of young patients with adenoidal disease.

Study of modified adenoidectomy by oral approach under endoscope

Endoscopic Assisted Adenoidectomy Versus Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Comparison of coblation,ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy

Clinical Effects of Adenoidectomy with Nasal Endoscope by Mouth:A Report of 64 Cases

[Comparison of the Powered-Assisted Adenoidectomy with Adenoid Curette Adenoidectomy].

Comparison among the Three Different Approaches in the Management of Adenoid Hypertrophy

Adenoidectomy through oral cavity under nasoendoscopy

Observation on the Efficacy of Nasal Endoscopy-assisted Treatment of Adenoidal Hypertrophy in Children

Trans-oral adenoidectomy under monitoring endoscope using powered handpiece

Experience with Adenoidectomy under Nasal Endoscope for Children's Snoring Diseases

Minimal Invasive Adenoidectomy under Nasal Endoscopy

Evaluation of curative effect and superiority of three approaches of endoscopic adenoidectomy in children

Comparison among the Three Different Adenoidectomy Approaches in the Anagement of Pediatric Obstruction Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome(osahs)

Adenoidectomy Through Nose under Endoscopy:With a Report of 35 Cases

[Comparison between the effect of endoscopic-assisted low temperature plasma and electric planer on the treatment of adenoid hypertrophy: a Meta-analysis].

A Prospective Comparative Study of Impedance Audiometry Findings Preoperatively and Postoperatively in Cases of Conventional Adenoidectomy versus Microdebrider Assisted Adenoidectomy

Different techniques of adenoidectomy and its impact on middle ear pressure: a randomized controlled study

Effect of Nasal Endoscopy-Assisted Adenoidectomy on the Development of Pediatric Chronic Sinusitis and Otitis Media with Effusion

To Explore Complication of Transnasal Endoscopic Adenoidectomy in Children

Conventional curettage adenoidectomy vs endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy – A comparative study

Assessment of middle ear function after conventional or endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy