The Clinical Evaluation of the Six Urinary Proteins with Dynamic Test in the Renal Allograft Recipients

LIN Zhifeng,WANG Xianghui,XU Da,ZHOU Peijun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2007.02.025

2007-01-01

Abstract:Objective:①Investigate the difference of the urinary proteins expression between the Group A(normal renal graft function) and Group B(abnormal renal graft function);②Reveal the possible clinical significance of the urinary proteins expression in the recipients who received a cadaver renal transplantation.Methods:34 recipients who received a cadaver renal transplantation in Ruijin Hospital from October 2004 to March 2005 were dynamic tested total 190 urine samples and analysed according to the data of recipients.Results:A1M and IGU were related to SCr in the 34 recipients(P0.05),especially the IGU.According to the comparison of Group A and Group B,we found the A1M、MA、TRU、IGU、NAG 、RBP 、SCr and CsA were higher in Group B than in Group A(RBPwas 69.6%,A1M 51.9%,TRU 29.2%,NAG 28.5% and MA 24.7%).But there were no statistic significance between the urinary proteins in Group A and them in Group B.There was statistic significance between the CsA in Grpup A and in Group B(P0.05).A1M and IGU were related to SCr in Group B(P0.05),especially the IGU(β=122.175).A1M、MA and IGU were related to SCr in Group A(P0.05),especially the IGU(β=16.147)and A1M(β=9.234).According to the comparison of Group B1(acute rejection subgroup) and Group B2(CsA nephrotoxicity subgroup),we found the A1M、MA、TRU、IGU and RBP were higher in Group B1 than in Group B2,especially MA(133.99%),TRU(59.90%) and IGU(51.21%).The NAG in Group B1 was 13.70% lower than it in Group B2.The A1M/SCr、MA/SCr and IGU/SCr were no statistic significance between Group B1 and Group B2(P0.05).Conclusions:The A1M、MA、TRU、IGU、NAG and RBP are convenient and safety monitoring markers for the clinical reference and evaluation.