Capital Ratio, Punishment Commitment and Borrower Runs

Chen Wen,Yang Yunhong,Gong Liutang
2012-01-01
Abstract:Due to borrowers’ strategic complementarities in deciding whether to repay or not, microfinance institutions (MFIs) may suffer borrower runs. By promising punishment for defaulters and choosing suitable capital structure, MFIs can mitigate borrower runs. Studying borrower runs problem in a global game framework, we find: (1) MFIs have incentive to promise too heavy punishment while promising too heavy punishment will reduce credibility of punishment commitment when borrowers avoid paying debts, which may exacerbate borrower runs; (2) As MFIs’ private optimal capital ratio is below the social optimal level, government should regulate their capital ratios. (3) The effect of raising capital ratio on mitigating borrower runs is mainly due to decreasing the level of punishment commitment and thus increasing credibility of punishment commitment. Based on our model, we can provide policy suggestions for mitigating borrower runs in microfinance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?