On the Legitimacy of Modal Logic

Zhang Lifeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2006.09.014
2006-01-01
Abstract:Through reviewing Quinean reading of modalities in detail, this essay points out that this type of reading is parochial and too much depends on context relation s beyond logic and language, and that goes against a general and formalized stud y of modalities from the standpoint of extension. At the same time, Quine’s obj ection to the third grade of modal involvement is unsuccessful, and modal predic ate logic is legitimate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?