Abstract:With the forthcoming release of high precision polarization measurements, such as from the Planck satellite, it becomes critical to evaluate the performance of estimators for the polarization fraction and angle. These two physical quantities suffer from a well-known bias in the presence of measurement noise, as has been described in part I of this series. In this paper, part II of the series, we explore the extent to which various estimators may correct the bias. Traditional frequentist estimators of the polarization fraction are compared with two recent estimators: one inspired by a Bayesian analysis and a second following an asymptotic method. We investigate the sensitivity of these estimators to the asymmetry of the covariance matrix which may vary over large datasets. We present for the first time a comparison among polarization angle estimators, and evaluate the statistical bias on the angle that appears when the covariance matrix exhibits effective ellipticity. We also address the question of the accuracy of the polarization fraction and angle uncertainty estimators. The methods linked to the credible intervals and to the variance estimates are tested against the robust confidence interval method. From this pool of estimators, we build recipes adapted to different use-cases: build a mask, compute large maps, and deal with low S/N data. More generally, we show that the traditional estimators suffer from discontinuous distributions at low S/N, while the asymptotic and Bayesian methods do not. Attention is given to the shape of the output distribution of the estimators, and is compared with a Gaussian. In this regard, the new asymptotic method presents the best performance, while the Bayesian output distribution is shown to be strongly asymmetric with a sharp cut at low S/N.Finally, we present an optimization of the estimator derived from the Bayesian analysis using adapted priors.

Some Sources of Systematic Errors on CMB Polarized Measurements with Bolometers

Beam Mismatch Effects in Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Measurements

Testing the Analytical Blind Separation Method in Simulated CMB Polarization Maps

Polarization measurements analysis I. Impact of the full covariance matrix on polarization fraction and angle measurements

Impact of Instrumental Systematic Contamination on the Lensing Mass Reconstruction using the CMB Polarization

Systematic effects in polarizing Fourier transform spectrometers for cosmic microwave background observations

Self-Calibration of CMB Polarization Experiments

Optimal Scan Strategies for Future CMB Satellite Experiments

Bandpass Mismatch Error for Satellite CMB Experiments II: Correcting for the Spurious Signal

Polarization measurements analysis II. Best estimators of polarization fraction and angle

Systematic Distortion in Cosmic Microwave Background Maps

BICEP2/Keck Array XI: Beam Characterization and Temperature-to-Polarization Leakage in the BK15 Data Set

Bandpass mismatch error for satellite CMB experiments I: estimating the spurious signal

Destriping of Polarized Data in a CMB Mission with a Circular Scanning Strategy

Destriping of polarized data in a CMB mission with a circular scanning strategy (vol 142, pg 499, 2000)

Simulations of Foreground Effects for CMB Polarization

Reexamining aspects of spacetime-symmetry breaking with CMB polarization

Map-making strategies for next generation CMB experiments

QuickPol: Fast calculation of effective beam matrices for CMB polarization

Planck data revisited: low-noise synchrotron polarisation maps from the WMAP and Planck space missions

Calibration Measurements of the BICEP3 and BICEP Array CMB Polarimeters from 2017 to 2024