Corporate Idiosyncratic Uncertainty and Innovation Investment
Zhong Huaming,Liu Zhiming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19592/j.cnki.scje.400358
2023-01-01
Abstract:In order to understand the long-term and short-term investment mismatch of China’s real economy, this paper empirically analyzes the relationship among corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty, firm financialization and innovation investment by using the quarterly data of China’s A-share listed non-financial enterprises from 2007 to 2019. The results show that corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty has a significant negative effect on innovation investment of non-financial firms. This may indicate that the real option effect is the main mechanism in the process of uncertainty affecting the innovation investment of real firms in China, and the future strategic“preemption/growth”effect caused by firm innovation investment is still secondary.The irreversibility of assets and the high adjustment cost of enterprises’ innovation investment still greatly hinder the initiative of innovation.In the heterogeneity analysis, compared with state-owned enterprises, non-manufacturing enterprises and non-hightech enterprises, the innovation investment of private enterprises, manufacturing enterprises and high-tech enterprises is significantly negatively affected by corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty. On one hand, private enterprises, manufacturing enterprises and high-tech enterprises are sensitive to changes in the macro market environment, vulnerable to formal financing constraints limit the entity enterprise, this is because the“soft budget constraint”of the existence and financing discrimination, makes these three kinds of enterprises are relatively difficult to obtain formal bank credit. On the other hand, due to their own innovation investment assets specificity is stronger, and at present China’s treatment of investment assets disposal need search cost and clearing cost is higher, lead to these enterprises to innovate sunk cost is higher. Therefore, under the company idiosyncratic uncertainty impact, they will choose to reduced innovation investment which the investment period and return period is relatively long.In the mechanism analysis, the increase of corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty makes non-financial firms increase the allocation of financial assets, but weakens shareholder value orientation. However, firm financialization（financial asset allocation and shareholder value orientation） has a significant negative effect on innovation investment.In a word, firm financialization plays an important role in the impact path of corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty on innovation investment. The results show that corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty not only has a direct effect on innovation investment, but also has an indirect effect on innovation investment through firm financialization. In terms of economic significance,the financialization of non-financial firms increases by 0.97 percentage points with each increase of one standard deviation of corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty. However, when the financialization of non-financial enterprises increases by one standard deviation, innovation investment decreases by 0.773 percentage points. Therefore, the rising corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty will strengthen the trend of firm financialization on the whole and hinder innovation investment through the intermediate path of firm financialization.Compared with the previous research, the possible contribution margin is: first, different from the past from the macro level uncertainty（macroeconomic uncertainty or policy uncertainty）, based on the micro level of corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty, investigate its influence on non-financial enterprise innovation investment activities, enrich the impact of corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty on the micro enterprise behavior research. Secondly, this paper studies the mechanism effect of firm financialization on the impact of corporate idiosyncratic uncertainty on innovation investment, deepening the relevant research on the relationship between uncertainty and innovation, and helping to expand the relevant literature on innovation economics. The research results of this paper have certain reference value for understanding how non-financial enterprises change their short-term and long term investment allocation in the face of uncertainty in the developing country, and show that China’s current policy measures to stabilize expectations, emphasize entity economy and promote innovation should be systematically examined, and its complexity and dynamic nature should be fully considered.