Abstract:Endocrine disruptors (EDs) have a variety of adverse effects in humans and animals. About 58,000 chemicals, most having little safety data, must be tested in a group of tiered assays. As assays will take years, it is important to develop rapid methods to help in priority setting. For application to large data sets, we have developed an integrated system that contains sequential four phases to predict the ability of chemicals to bind to the estrogen receptor (ER), a prevalent mechanism for estrogenic EDs. Here we report the results of evaluating two types of QSAR models for inclusion in phase III to quantitatively predict chemical binding to the ER. Our data set for the relative binding affinities (RBAs) to the ER consists of 130 chemicals covering a wide range of structural diversity and a 6 orders of magnitude spread of RBAs. CoMFA and HQSAR models were constructed and compared for performance. The CoMFA model had a r2 = 0.91 and a q2LOO = 0.66. HQSAR showed reduced performance compared to CoMFA with r2 = 0.76 and q2LOO = 0.59. A number of parameters were examined to improve the CoMFA model. Of these, a phenol indicator increased the q2LOO to 0.71. When up to 50% of the chemicals were left out in the leave-N-out cross-validation, the q2 remained significant. Finally, the models were tested by using two test sets; the q2pred for these were 0.71 and 0.62, a significant result which demonstrates the utility of the CoMFA model for predicting the RBAs of chemicals not included in the training set. If used in conjunction with phases I and II, which reduced the size of the data set dramatically by eliminating most inactive chemicals, the current CoMFA model (phase III) can be used to predict the RBA of chemicals with sufficient accuracy and to provide quantitative information for priority setting.

QSAR Study of Natural, Synthetic and Environmental Endocrine Disrupting Compounds for Binding to the Androgen Receptor

QSAR Study of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

Predicting the Androgenicity of Structurally Diverse Compounds from Molecular Structure Using Different Classifiers

In silico study on hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls as androgen receptor antagonists.

QSAR Study on Estrogenic Activity of Structurally Diverse Compounds Using Generalized Regression Neural Network

Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and Structure-Based 3D-QSAR Studies on the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonistic Activity of Hydroxylated Polychlorinated Biphenyls.

3d-Qsar And Docking Studies Of Estrogen Compounds Based On Estrogen Receptor Beta

In silico investigations of anti-androgen activity of polychlorinated biphenyls

Computational Models to Predict Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Binding with Androgen or Oestrogen Receptors.

Modeling and Insights into the Structural Characteristics of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals

Computational Studies of Interactions Between Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Androgen Receptor of Different Vertebrate Species

Qsar Prediction of Estrogen Activity for A Large Set of Diverse Chemicals under the Guidance of Oecd Principles

Evaluation and QSAR Modeling on Multiple Endpoints of Estrogen Activity Based on Different Bioassays

QSAR Models Using a Large Diverse Set of Estrogens

Development of QSAR Models for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals to Eight Fish Estrogen Receptor.

Qualitative and Quantitative Simulation of Androgen Receptor Antagonists: A Case Study of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers.

Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts.

Predictive Models for Identifying the Binding Activity of Structurally Diverse Chemicals to Human Pregnane X Receptor.

In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship of Compounds Binding to Estrogen Receptor Β Based on Heuristic Method

ED Profiler: Machine Learning Tool for Screening Potential Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals