Change in the International Order-and China's Options
Tang Shiping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464476_007
2021-01-01
Abstract:AbstractAfter the 2008 financial crisis, discussions at home and abroad on the existing international order, which is based on the United States and the West, and on its future have increased significantly, but most of the relevant research results lack both a workable framework for the assessment of the international order and an empirical analysis of historical changes in the international order. By constructing a relatively complete framework for defining and assessing the international order and examining major changes of international order since 1800, we can provide a list of possible Chinese options, i.e., China is still to be a “builder of world peace, contributor to global development, and defender of the international order.” As long as it is determined that no country can truly block China’s economic growth from the outside, and that China’s economic growth depends more on domestic reform and opening up, what China needs to do is to keep calm, govern itself well while persisting in reform and opening up, and do its utmost to work with other countries and non-state actors to steadily improve the international order for the benefit of the world.