Detection of Sentinel Node Micometastases and Its Clinical Significance in Tongue Cancer with Clinically NO Neck
彭汉伟,郭朱明,曾宗渊,王顺兰,张诠
2008-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE:This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of detecting micrometases of the sentinel nodes(SN) harvested in patients with clinically N0 tongue cancer with RT-PCR assay using CK19 mRNA as the marker,as well as to discuss at gene level the necessity of selective neck dissection in tongue cancer with clinically N0 neck.METHODS:SNs of 21 cases of tongue cancer with clinically N0 neck were detected with handheld γ probe.CK19 gene expression of the harvested SNs was detected with RT-PCR assay.CK19 expression in 10 cervical lymph nodes with chronic inflammation and 10 pathologically proven metastatic lymph nodes were compared with that of the SNs.SPSS10.0 software package was used for Chi-square test.RESULTS:A total of 53 SNs were detected in 20 out of 21 cases of tongue cancer with clinically N0 neck.1-4 SNs were detected in each case,averagely 2.65 SNs per case.The sensitivity and specificity of evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis by CK19 gene expression with RT-PCR assay were 90% and 80%,respectively.When routine pathologic analysis was used,2 out of 20 cases whose SNs were detected were found with cervical lymph node metastases,with 10% of occult metastasis.In 51 SNs that were pathologically negative with routine histological examination,11 SNs from 7 cases were found with expression of CK19-mRNA,with micrometastatic rate of 21.57% and occult metastatic rate of 35%.Occult metastatic rate evaluated by these two methods was significantly different,P=0.013.CONCLUSIONS:Due to micrometastases,it’s unreliable to select a type of neck dissection according to SN biopsy with routine pathological analysis.Selective neck dissection is still the first choice for neck treatment for clinically N0 tongue cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?