The Influence of Attack Motives in Violent Video Games on Aggression

Shi Guijuan,Gao Xuemei,Li Juan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2013.03.027

2013-01-01

Abstract:Studies suggest that the exposure to violent video games increases aggressive cognitive fluency and promotes pro-violence attitude.However,there are still some disagreements on the violent-content-only hypothesis.In order to establish the relative influence of each component,more and more studies have been designed to separate different components contained in violent video games.Although it was found that some components would lead to an obvious increase in aggression,studies had failed to take into account the role of players in the relationship between violent components and increased violence.As role playing is a common element in both old and new games,the present study controlled players' attack motive while employing role playing as an element in the game.And this is a different attempt from the previous research.Meanwhile,players' experience with violent video games could not be ignored,either.This study adopted the word response task and extrinsic affect Simon task paradigm to explore the impact of violent video games on aggressive cognitive fluency and implicit aggressive evaluation of players with different attack motives and violent video game experience.And this study included two independent variables;game types and player's experience with violent video games.Three game types were;active attack,reactive attack and non-violence.In terms of player's experience,participants were divided into the experienced and the inexperienced.Their experience with violent video games was measured with the violent video game habits survey.In order to reduce bias,an evaluating scale was added which was completed by 22 evaluators.The study arrives at several conclusions.Firstly,the influence of violent video games on aggressive cognitive fluency and implicit evaluation is subject to both the participants' attack motives and experience.Secondly,the defense attack role is more effective in priming the short-term aggressive cognition of the inexperienced participants,while the active attack role is more effective in activating cognitive structures of the experienced.Thirdly,the experienced tend to evaluate attack words negatively in the active attack group while positively in the reactive attack group,and all the participants evaluate defense words negatively.Fourthly,long-term exposure to violent video games inhibits aggressive cognitive fluency and improve pro-violence attitude.The greatest significance of this research lies in our discovery that violent video games do not enhance aggression.Some factors,such as attack motives,even can reduce the negative effect of violent video games on aggression.We can take advantage of this to free people from worries about its adverse effect.