The outcome comparison between all-arthroscopic and arthroscopic assisted mini-open neoplasty in rotator cuff repair

LI Hong-yun,CHEN Shi-yi,CHEN Shi-qiu,LI Yun-xia,CHEN Ji-wu
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results between all-arthroscopic and arthroscopic-assisted with mini-open repairing of rotator cuff.Methods We compared the clinical results of two different operative methods on 56 shoulders (55 patients) from Mar.2004 to Dec.2006 at Huashan Hospital,Fudan University.The patients were divided into two groups,group A (30 shoulders,29 patients) and group B (26 shoulders,26 patients),and they were followed up at least for 19 months after the procedures with an average of 27.0 months.The rotator cuffs repair were performed by arthroscopic-assisted mini-open in group A and by all-arthroscopic management in group B respectively.The evaluation methods were hospitalization time,complications,range of motion,muscular strength,ASES,UCLA,VAS scores,and the intact of the rotator cuff was evaluated by MRI.Results The scores of ASES,UCLA and VAS were increased after the procedure in both groups (P<0.01),but the improvements of the scores were not different significantly between two groups.Re-tears rate of the rotator cuff was found in 4 (13.3%) in group A and 3 (11.5%) in group B.The improvements of the ASES,UCLA and VAS scores were no significant difference between rotator cuff re-tear and intact patients.Conclusions No statistical difference in clinical outcome was found between all-arthroscopic and arthroscopic-assisted mini-open rotator cuff repair during 2 to 3 years follow-up period.The rates of ret-ears were 10% to 15%,and the functional score had no difference between rotator cuff ret-ear and intact patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?