Abstract:The "requisition-compensation balance policy" is a basic arable land protection policy promulgated by the Chinese government to maintain the dynamic balance of the total arable land. Since the implementation of the "requisition-compensation balance policy", its important role in the conservation of arable land has been widely noted. Multiple studies indicate the effectiveness of the policy by estimating the quantity and quality change of arable land. In addition, the defects and negative externalities of the policy are disputed. The overall goal of this study is to estimate the provincial-level effectiveness of the "requisition-compensation balance policy" in mainland China in two periods (i.e., 2000—2010; 2010—2020) from four perspectives: arable land quantity dynamic balance; arable land productivity balance; farming distance; and sustainability of arable land use. The results showed that, first, the arable land quantity balance was achieved during 2000–2020 from a national perspective. There are still 19–23% of provinces have failed to reach the quantity balance. Second, the decrease in China's total arable land productivity was exacerbated from 9612.1 thousand tons. to 31254.6 thousand ton. The average potential yield balance index was less than 1 for nearly all provinces during 2000–2010 and became even worse in the next decade because of occupying superior arable land while compensating for inferior arable land. The conservation of arable land productivity has become more important than the conservation of quantity. Third, due to the lack of constraints on the farming distance changes in the "requisition-compensation balance policy", most provinces convert arable land around urban and rural areas to built-up land while replenishing land far from residential areas without providing adequate agricultural infrastructure, which leads to an increase in the cost of farming and consequently to an increase in the marginalization of arable land. During 2010–2020, the average farming distance of compensated arable land at the provincial level reached 2–7 times that of occupied arable land. However, the average farming distance of the whole arable land at the provincial level decreased by 3.82–63.88% during the same period. This contradiction is mainly due to increasing marginalization and opportunity costs resulting in arable land with high farming distance (including arable land that was compensated in the past) to be used with low intensity or even abandoned and thus identified as other land use types by remote sensing classification models. This factor outweighed that of "occupy nearby arable land while compensating farther one", resulting in a reduction in the provincial average farming distance. Fourth, the percentage of sustainable compensated arable land in most provinces was lower than 70%. This indicated that the utilization and protection of arable land in these provinces was insufficiently implemented and monitored. Challenges along optimization of the "requisition-compensation balance policy" were discussed from two respects: data, theory and methodology and policy design and implementation. The authors argue that a more comprehensive "requisition-compensation balance policy" should be designed considering not only the quantity and productivity of arable land but also the farming distance, sustainability and ecological protection. A differentiated regulation mechanism of arable land requisition compensation in trans-provincial areas should be formulated. This study can provide guidance for optimizing the implementation of regional arable land protection and can also provide a reference for other countries to protect arable land.

Arable Land Conversion Effects of Basic Farmland Protection Policy

The effects of basic arable land protection planning in Fuyang County, Zhejiang Province, China

Arable Land Conservation Effects of Land Supervision in China

Comparison of the Prime Farmland Interchange Protection and the Transferable Development Rights

Comparatively Study on Land Conversion Driving Factor:Theory and Empirical Analysis

Gains and Losses: Does Farmland Acquisition Harm Farmers’ Welfare?

Assessment on the effect of city arable land protection under the implementation of China's National General Land Use Plan (2006–2020)

The Quantitative Impact of the Arable Land Protection Policy on the Landscape of Farmland Abandonment in Guangdong Province

Cultivated Land Protection Policies in China Facing 2030: Dynamic Balance System Versus Basic Farmland Zoning

Arable Land Conservation Effects of Land Use Dynamic Monitoring in China

Estimate provincial-level effectiveness of the arable land requisition-compensation balance policy in mainland China in the last 20 years

Intergenerational Allocation of Farmland Conversion and Farmland Resource Loss

Spatial Allocation Efficiency of Farmland Conversion and Farmland Resource Loss in China

Farmland preservation policies in China and their impacts on urban expansion: a multilevel analysis

Assessing farmland protection policy in China

Assessment on the Impact of Arable Land Protection Policies in a Rapidly Developing Region

Exploration on the reasons for low efficiency of arable land protection policy in China: an evolutionary game theoretic model

Land use policy impacts on effective farmland planting area: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China

Quantitative Assessment on the Impact of Governmental Intervention on Land Allocation Efficiency in the Processes of Farmland Acquisition and Urban Land Conveyance

Temporal and Spatial Variability of Agricultural Land Loss in Relation to Policy and Accessibility in a Low Hilly Region of Southeast China

Does Cropland Threaten Urban Land Use Efficiency in the Peri-Urban Area? Evidence from Metropolitan Areas in China