Impact of Nifedipine on pregnant women with threatened premature labor and their fetuses

XIONG Yuan-hong,PEI Hai-ying,YANG Ling,CHEN Qian,CHU Xiao-li
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the reliability and safety of Nifedipine for pregnant women with threatened premature labor, and observe their effects on newborns. Methods One hundred and fifty pregnant women with threatened premature labor and fetuses in our hospital from June 2011 to June 2012 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: the study group and the control group. Patients in the study group were treated with Nifedipine, while those in the control group were treated with ritodrine hydrochloride. The onset time, duration, fetus protection success rate, blood pressure, heart rate, costs and adverse reactions were observed. Results The time of the uterine contraction inhibited was significantly shorter in the study group than the control group (P<0.05). The inhibition maintain time was significantly longer in the study group than the control group (P<0.05). The effective rate was 93.33% in the study group and 90.67% in the control group, with statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The blood pressure of the two groups was within the normal range, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Heart rate in patients of the control group was significantly higher than the study group (P<0.05). The Apgar score of the preterm children in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the weight of preterm children and admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), P>0.05. Drug side effects in the study group was slightly less than those in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The costs of the study group was significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion For treating threatened premature labor, Nifedipine can effectively shorten the onset time, extend the maintenance time, and reduce side effects, which can be actively promoted in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?