Abstract:In ages of rapid changes and growing competitiveness, innovation is considered as the primary driver for firms to keep sustainable competitiveness, achieve technological catch-up and continue growing beyond catching-up. From the standpoint of firms, organizational learning is a crucial path toward innovation. Organizational learning is required not only to take full advantage of the existing knowledge stock, but also to explore new knowledge and technological opportunities. The former is exploitative learning based on existing knowledge, and the latter is explorative learning oriented to new knowledge and techniques. However, exploitative learning and explorative learning tap into totally different organizational routines and management behavior. Due to the finite resources and capabilities, firms face the dilemma between exploitative and explorative learning. How to organize explorative and exploitative learning in a reasonable manner is the key solution for firms to build efficient and effective R&D systems. Compared with firms in developed country, Chinese firms face constraints, such as scarce resources, imperfect market infrastructure,poor innovation capability and insufficient advanced knowledge. Thus, the trade-off between explorative learning and exploitative learning becomes more challenging. Chinese firms need to learn how to rationally allocate limited resources in ambidextrous learning so as to maximize the innovation performance. Scholars hold different opinions on whether innovation performance could benefit from ambidextrous learning. In addition, internal contextual factor is the carrier of ambidextrous learning which deserves attention. The role of internal contextual factors in the ambidextrous learning and the innovation mechanism need further exploration and validation. Therefore, to investigate the mechanism of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance is important for both practices and theory building. In this research, we investigate some global semiconductor companies listed in America. The patent data of these firms between 1991 and 2000 are collected and analyzed with the help of multiple techniques. Based on a view of knowledge, this research discusses two mechanisms of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance, respectively combined ambidextrous learning and balanced ambidextrous learning. The empirical results show that combined ambidextrous learning positively improves firms' innovation performance,while balanced ambidextrous learning negatively reduces innovation performance. In addition,this research adopts a micro-level lens and claims that internal contextual factors are fundamental factors for the mechanism of ambidextrous learning and innovation performance. As a significant contextual factor,an intra-organizational R&D collaboration network is constructed by using patent citation. The empirical research shows that the density of intra-organizational R&D collaboration network significantly moderates the mechanism of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance. When intra-organizational collaboration network gets higher, the positive influence of combined ambidextrous learning would be weakens,and the negative influence of balanced ambidextrous learning s deteriorates. Based on the boundary of organizational cognition, this research seeks new methods to evaluate exploitative or explorative learning, which to some extent helps explain the inconsistency in existing literature. The empirical result implicates that the pursuit of the balance between exploitative learning and explorative learning is not the best solution. An adjustment on each proportion according to different strategic orientations is necessary. Furthermore, this research focuses on the importance of internal contextual factors. By calculating the density of intra-organizational network, this research provides a theoretical foundation and practical guide for the construction of R&D collaboration networks.

Explorative Learning and Exploitative Learning:Antinomy or Synergy?

The synergy and dynamic between explorative learning and exploitative learning:An empirical study

Balancing Explorative and Exploitative Learning under Open Innovation: an Empirical Study in China

An Empirical Analysis of Relationships Between Relationship Learning and Technological Innovation

Exploratory Learning and Exploitative Learning in Different Organizational Structures

The mechanism between explorative and exploitative technological learning

Study on the Balance and Complementary Effects Between Exploitation Learning and Exploration Learning

Organizational Change and Market Process:An Entrepreneurial Perspective

Explorative and Exploitative Learning in Teams: Unpacking the Antecedents and Consequences

Exploration–Exploitation Duality with Both Tradeoff and Synergy: the Curvilinear Interaction Effects of Learning Modes on Innovation Types

To Explore Innovation Synergy Rule & Its Effectiveness by SD Modeling in Portfolio Perspective — Study on Innovation Capacity Evolution Rule

Balance between exploitation learning and exploration learning of Chinese enterprises

Open Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: the Role of Organizational Learning

Explorations Of Improvisational Learning In Innovation

Bottom‐up Learning, Organizational Formalization, and Ambidextrous Innovation

Empirical Study on Relationship between Organizational Learning and Ambidextrous Innovation in High-tech Enterprises

The Mechanism of Ambidextrous Learning in Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Intra-organizational Collaboration Network

Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Per-formance: Influence of Business Strategies and Environment

"Discipline vs. Passion: Collectivism, Centralization and Ambidextrous Innovation"

Unpacking the Paradox of Openness in Megaproject Innovation Ecosystems

Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis