Abstract:Among the organizational change literature,adaptation view and ecological view were two dominant perspectives.Adaptation view suggests that the purpose of organizational change is to adapt and achieve strategic fit with their environment.Yet researchers embracing ecological view have argued for an environmental selection process which determined the outcome of organization's behavior.This study recommends a brand new research paradigm,named the entrepreneurial view after a brief review of the two former perspectives.We developed a multi-level analytic framework to examine the effects of organization's proactive activities on its competitive advantage.It has long been noted that in a complex and intense competitive situation,the performance of an organization was dependent on its actions and rivals' reactions,so we were also concerned about how the organization's activities might affect the market process.The results indicated that proactive top managers of the firm would set expectations and search to identify the opportunities resulted from knowledge problem existing in the market.Those actions could establish a firm's competitive advantage to the extent that they exploit competitive ambiguity.Entrepreneurial alertness,professional knowledge,and creativity were three most important predictors of opportunity identification.Top managers adopted a bisociation process linking previously related or unrelated matrices of thought to seize the opportunities through entrepreneurial actions.Schumpeter and Kirzner had respectively defined entrepreneurial actions in two distinctive ways which we proposed as equilibrating and disequilibrating actions.Both actions were the consequence of bisociation process.Entrepreneurial actions carried out by the firm would eventually update the belief systems of all the market participants,yet leading to different market conditions according to the actions' appropriateness.It's in this way the firm had the capability to push the market process.Further in this study we used competitive dynamics theory to discuss how the firms evolved with their environment and to explore how two characteristics of the top management team might influence firm's competitive success.A series of interrelated and logically consistent propositions were presented to elaborate our analytic framework.Implications for the entrepreneurial view were discussed.

The Paradox and Soiutions in Business Innovation

Toward a Holistic and Dynamic Framework of Paradox Management:Product Innovation High-Tech Firms

Organizational Change and Market Process:An Entrepreneurial Perspective

Exploration–Exploitation Duality with Both Tradeoff and Synergy: the Curvilinear Interaction Effects of Learning Modes on Innovation Types

How Does Paradox Strategic Cognition Affect Radical Innovation Performance in Established Firms?

Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Team Model for Simultaneously Exploring and Exploiting

Social Capital Related Paradoxes and Ambidextrous Alliance Innovation：The Role of Yin-Yang Thinking and Dynamic Combinations

International Business, Innovation and Ambidexterity: A Micro-Foundational Perspective

Navigating the tensions in environmental innovation: a paradox perspective

From Contingencies To Paradoxes Exploring Tensions In Research On Alliance Portfolios And Innovation

How incentive synergy and organizational structures shape innovation ambidexterity

The New Mechanism of Organizational Ambidexterity--Cross-domain Ambidexterity

Dilemma and Outlet in the Evolution Process of Firms' Capabilities

Research on Ambidextrous Innovation Based on Enterprise Dynamic Capabilities

Paradoxical Leadership and Innovation in Work Teams: the Multilevel Mediating Role of Ambidexterity and Leader Vision As a Boundary Condition

Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: the role of digital transformation

Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams

Paradox, dialectics or trade‐offs? A double loop model of paradox

Configurations of Ambidextrous Innovation and Its Performance Implication in the Context of Digital Transformation

Inventor Knowledge Network Structural Holes and Ambidexterity Innovation in High-tech SMEs

The Rule and Mechanism of Innovation Capability-Environmental Dynamism Coevolution: A Longitude Case Study of Chinese Firm in Transition