Abstract:The Internet has been witnessing the success of Peer-toPeer (P2P) live streaming during the past three years. A number of commercial P2P streaming software has emerged on Internet (such as PPLive to name a few). Almost all these P2P streaming systems are based on pull-based (or called “data-driven”/“swarming”) protocol [4, 2]. In this type of protocol, the live media content is divided into segments and every node periodically notifies its neighbors of what packets it has. Then each node explicitly requests the segments of interest from its neighbors according to their notification. This protocol is very similar to that of BitTorrent, and the major difference from BitTorrent is that each node only requests the latest generated segments in a much smaller window (called request window). The well-acknowledged advantages of pullbased protocol are its robustness and simplicity. However, we would like to report a graceful characteristic of pull-based protocol that has not been paid enough attention: with appropriate protocol design and parameter settings, the simplest pull-based protocol without any intelligent scheduling and bandwidth measurement is nearly optimal in bandwidth utilization and system throughput, that is, as long as the total upload capacity supply is a little higher than the minimum bandwidth demand, all the peers can obtain nearly 100% playback quality. On the other hand, the most outstanding drawback of pull-based streaming is its tradeoff between control overhead and delay [3]: to minimize the delay, each node notifies its neighbors of packet arrivals as soon as it receives the packet and the neighbor should request the packet immediately after receiving the notification, resulting in a remarkable control overhead; while, to diminish the overhead, a node can wait until dozens of packets arrived and inform these packets to its neighbors once in a packet meanwhile the neighbors can also request a bunch of packets once, which obviously leads to a considerable delay. An interesting question is whether there exists any protocol that can not only hold the near optimality in upload capacity utilization but also achieve both much lower delay and smaller overhead. Fortunately, a simple protocol called hybrid pull-push protocol we proposed has all these features.

Survey of Peel-to-Peer Streaming Technology

Challenges On Peer-To-Peer Live Media Streaming

Flourishing in the internet: The huge success of live peer-to-peer media streaming

Peer-to-peer live video streaming on the internet: issues, existing approaches, and challenges [Peer-to-Peer Multimedia Streaming]

Inside the New Coolstreaming: Principles, Measurements and Performance Implications.

Deploying P2P Networks for Large-Scale Live Video-Streaming Service [Peer-to-peer Multimedia Streaming].

Survey of research on SVC-based P2P streaming systems

Research Advances in Key Technology of P2P-Based VoD Systems

Research on Key Technologies of Large-Scale Streaming Media

Understanding and Supporting Live and On-Demand Streaming Service

Towards a universal friendly peer-to-peer media streaming: metrics, analysis and explorations

P2P Live Streaming System Integrated with IP Multicast

Improvement of P2P Live System Based on Peercast

A P2P media streaming system integrated with live and VoD based on QoS-aware

THE STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A P2P-BASED STREAMING SYSTEM

Towards a Trustworthy and Controllable Peer-Server-Peer Media Streaming: an Analytical Study and an Industrial Perspective.

Study of P2P-based Video Conference System

Understanding the Power of Pull Based P2P Live Streaming and Doing Even Better

Peer-to-Peer Live Streaming and Video On Demand Design Issues and its Challenges

Live Video Streaming Service over Peer to Peer Network: Design, Implementation and Experience

Understanding the Power of Pull-based P2P Live Streaming and Doing Even Better