Abstract:The Eshelby problem consists in determining the strain field of an infinite linearly elastic homogeneous medium due to a uniform eigenstrain prescribed over a subdomain, called inclusion, of the medium. The salient feature of Eshelby's solution for an ellipsoidal inclusion is that the strain tensor field inside the latter is uniform. This uniformity has the important consequence that the solution to the fundamental problem of determination of the strain field in an infinite linearly elastic homogeneous medium containing an embedded ellipsoidal inhomogeneity and subjected to remote uniform loading can be readily deduced from Eshelby's solution for an ellipsoidal inclusion upon imposing appropriate uniform eigenstrains. Based on this result, most of the existing micromechanics schemes dedicated to estimating the effective properties of inhomogeneous materials have been nevertheless applied to a number of materials of practical interest where inhomogeneities are in reality non-ellipsoidal. Aiming to examine the validity of the ellipsoidal approximation of inhomogeneities underlying various micromechanics schemes, we first derive a new boundary integral expression for calculating Eshelby's tensor field (ETF) in the context of two-dimensional isotropic elasticity. The simple and compact structure of the new boundary integral expression leads us to obtain the explicit expressions of ETF and its average for a wide variety of non-elliptical inclusions including arbitrary polygonal ones and those characterized by the finite Laurent series. In light of these new analytical results, we show that: (i) the elliptical approximation to the average of ETF is valid for a convex non-elliptical inclusion but becomes inacceptable for a non-convex non-elliptical inclusion; (ii) in general, the Eshelby tensor field inside a non-elliptical inclusion is quite non-uniform and cannot be replaced by its average; (iii) the substitution of the generalized Eshelby tensor involved in various micromechanics schemes by the average Eshelby tensor for non-elliptical inhomogeneities is in general inadmissible.

A regularized domain integral formulation for inclusion problems of various shapes by equivalent inclusion method

General Solution for Inhomogeneous Line Inclusion with Non-Uniform Eigenstrain

Numerical solution for elastic half-plane inclusion problems by different integral equation approaches

A Necessary and Sufficient Boundary Integral Formulation for Plane Elasticity Problems

Inclusions in a Finite Elastic Body

Shape of a single inclusion enclosing uniform stress for a non-uniform far-field loading in anti-plane shear

Elliptic rigid inclusion in soft materials of harmonic type

Elastic prolate spheroidal inclusion in an infinite elastic solid—an exact analysis of the inclusion stress by an engineering treatment of the problem based on the corresponding cavity solutions

Stable determination of an inclusion in an elastic body by boundary measurements (unabridged)

Non-elliptical inclusions that achieve uniform internal strain fields in an elastic half-plane

Geometrical Shape of In-Plane Inclusion Characterized by Polynomial Internal Stress Field under Uniform Eigenstrains

Two-dimensional nonlocal Eshelby's inclusion theory: eigenstress-driven formulation and applications

Boundary element method for problems with multiple types of inclusions

Eshelby's problem of inclusion with arbitrary shape in an isotropic elastic half-plane

A boundary integral method for multiple circular inclusions in an elastic half-plane

Asymptotic analysis of the stress concentration between two adjacent stiff inclusions in all dimensions

Elastic fields in two imperfectly bonded half-planes with a thermal inclusion of arbitrary shape

The Elastic Field Caused by a Circular Cylindrical Inclusion—Part II: Inside the Region x12 + x22 > a2, −∞ < x3 < ∞ Where the Circular Cylindrical Inclusion is Expressed by x12 + x22 ≤ a2, −h ≤ x3 ≤ h

Eshelby's problem of non-elliptical inclusions

Contact stress analysis of an elastic half-plane containing multiple inclusions

Thin inclusion at the junction of two elastic bodies: non-coercive case