Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Interbank Bonds Market Treasury Rate Term Structure and Inflation Predict

Research on Term Structure of Treasury Interest Rates Using a New Model

The Factors That Affect Market Interest Rates in Chinese Bond Market

Dynamic Research for Term Structure of Shibor

Why Are Excess Returns on China’s Treasury Bonds So Predictable? the Role of the Monetary System

An Empirical Analysis on the Casual Relationship Between Intra-bank and Exchange Bond Market

Long-Term Interbank Bond Rate Prediction Based on ICEEMDAN and Machine Learning

Treasury Bond Pricing Via No Arbitrage Arguments and Machine Learning: Evidence from China

Term Structure of Interest Rates and Economic Growth Expectations

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Why are Excess Returns on China’s Treasury Bonds So Predictable?

Fitting Term Structure of Interest Rates with Cubic Spline Function Based on Least Absolute Deviations Regression

Interest Rate Pass-through in a Dual-track System:Evidence from China

China'S Official Rates and Bond Yields

Empirical Research on Term Structure of Interest Rates Model Using Exponential Splines

The Term Structure of Inflation Expectations

Preferred-Habitat and Demand Factors in the Term Structure: Evidence from the Chinese Bond Market

Bond return predictability: Macro factors and machine learning methods

Chinese Synthesized Term Structure of Interest Rate.

An Empirical Study of Bond Price Discovery in Exchange Market and Inter-bank Market

Interest Rate Term-structure and Its Information Value for Predicting T-bonds Returns in the SSE