Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

A Study on the Types of Governance and Autonomy of Urban and Rural Communities in Western China in the Course of Urbanization

Government and Community in China's Village Autonomy

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China

A Typological Study of Governance Structure of China's Urban Community

Conditions and Mechanism of Democratic Autonomy in Rural Community

A REVIEW ON THE RESEARCH OF URBAN AND REGIONAL GOVERNANCE IN CHINA

Urban Community Governance: Confusion and Thinking

Literature Review on National Democratic Self-government of Urban Community in China

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Relationship Between Local Government Management and Community Autonomy in China

A Study on Urban Governance in China

Are Chinese Urban Communities Moving towards the Mode of Governance---A Framework of Structure-process

Research on the Various Types of “Three Governance Integration” Models in China’s Rural Areas

Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance

Formalization and Legality——Change of Urban Community System at the Grass-Roots Level and Interpretation of Its Role

How are New Community Governance Structures Formed in Urban China?

Rural municipality administration and local self-government in the modern Chinese countryside: self-government and property in the late 20th — early 21st centuries

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

State Control and Governance of Residential Communities. The case to be examined: community mediation in Shanghai

Research on Self-governance by Residents of Old Communities without Property Management

From Governance to Rural-Urban Co-Governance: Research Frontiers, Trends, and the Chinese Paths