MIDDLE TRIASSIC MIXOSAURIDS OF PANXIAN,GUIZHOU AND PROIBLEMS OF"MIXOSAURUS YANGJUANENSIS LIU AND YIN,2008"
Motani R,Schmitz L
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0001-6616.2008.03.013
2008-01-01
Abstract:Family Mixosauridae is a monophyletic group strongly supported by the phylogenetic analysis and contains two sister genera,Mixosaurus and Phalarodon.The first mixosaurid record from Asia and China,a single fragmentary specimen from Maotai(northern Guizhou,southwestern China),was reported by Young(1960,1965),and the name was erected.In subsequent studies,this taxon was rarely considered valid because its holotype is very fragmentary and has no taxonomic value at the species level,and is not diagnostic.Hence,Mixosaurus Young,1965 is a nomen dubium.To preserve this historical species name with the specimens from Panxian of Guizhou may be understandable,but it does not comply with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.Abundant and completely articulated skeletons of Middle Triassic marine reptiles,including ichthyosaurs,placodonts,nothosaurs,archoosaur and protorosaur,were recently excavated from the upper Member of Guanling Formation in near Yangjuan Village of Xinmin District in Panxian County(western Guizhou).The marine reptile fossil horizon can be ascribed to the conodont Nicoraella kockeli Zone,which indicates that the age of the horizon is middle Pelsonian of Middle Anisian in the Middle Triassic.Two mixosaurid taxa from this horizon were reported.One is panxianensis Jiang et al.,2006,which is separated from other mixosaur species by both cranial and postcranial characters such as the jugal with a small posteroventral flange.The other is Phalarodon cf.P.fraasi Merriam,1910,which is identified by its characteristic dentition and its narial shelf.Many mixosaurid specimens from Panxian were purchased,not collected scientifically and not prepared in detail by trained technicians.Liu and Yin(2008)erected a name yangjuanensis on a small individual in ventral view.The species lacks uniquely derived diagnostic characters,partly because the skull of the only specimen is unexposed,whereas cranial characters are important in distinguishing among mixosaurid species.Its postcranial features obviously indicate its Mixosaurid affinity,and its broad and short humerus can ascribe it into the genus Mixosaurus.However,the lack of information caused by unfinished preparation prevents a phylogenetic analysis and hence a clear diagnosis of the species.Furthermore,they clearly misidentified important bones that they used for their diagnosis of Mixosaurus yangjuanensis:1)the is actually the right in ventral view,and its dotted-lined long anterior extension is not true.Correspondingly,the scapula is the true right coracoid in ventral view;2)the radius is actually the ulna,and the ulna is the true radius;3)the ulnare should be the true radiale,the radiale should be the true pisiform 1,and the supposed fourth centralia should be the true ulnare;4)the extra rudimentary sixth and seventh fingers are very unusual,and should be scrutinized further given that their specimen exhibits signs of modification during preparation.Besides above problems,Liu and Yin(2008)reported another two species of from same locality and same horizon:Mixosaurus and Mixosaurus maotaiensis.Their specimen of Mixosaurus has no diagnostic features of true cornalianus,is definitely not cornalianus but shows a diagnostic feature of panxianensis.Their emended diagnosis of Mixosaurus maotaiensis does not contain any autoapomorphy,and instead lists synapomorphies of Family Mixosauridae and even Order Ichthyosauria as if they are unique to this species.Such an emendation is invalid.