On linguistic metalanguage and metalinguistic studies

Feng Zongxin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0429.2005.06.001
2005-01-01
Abstract:Linguistic metalanguage is disciplinarily different from, and covers a larger scope than, logical metalanguage which originally came out of logicians' solution to “the liar's paradox”. Linguistic metalanguage can be both the linguist's “jargon” and the layman's communicative tools due to its self-referential and self-reflexive nature. However, linguists (especially “orthodox linguists”) have not paid due attention to their jargon. This paper discusses the semiotic nature of metalanguage as a sign system, reviews the status quo of its studies, and points out some questions calling for further inquiry.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?