The Costs of Bankruptcy: Chapter 7 Liquidation Versus Chapter 11 Reorganization

A Bris,I Welch,N Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00872.x
2006-01-01
Abstract:Our paper explores a comprehensive sample of small and large corporate bankruptcies in Arizona and New York from 1995 to 2001. Bankruptcy costs are very heterogeneous and sensitive to the measurement method used. We find that Chapter 7 liquidations appear to be no faster or cheaper (in terms of direct expense) than Chapter 11 reorganizations. However, Chapter 11 seems to preserve assets better, thereby allowing creditors to recover relatively more. Our paper also provides a large number of further empirical regularities. OUR PAPER ANALYZES THE LARGEST SAMPLE OF CORPORATE bankruptcies to date. We research approximately 300 cases from the Arizona and New York federal bankruptcy courts from 1995 to 2001. These cases consist of (1) both publicly traded and privately held corporations, and (2) both Chapter 7 liquidations and Chapter 11 reorganizations. This sample is practically the entire population of unique corporate bankruptcies in these courts. Our paper’s primary objective is to measure how the two available bankruptcy procedures differ, especially but not only in terms of cost. We explore four variables, namely: the change in the estate’s value during bankruptcy (a measure of indirect costs), the time spent in bankruptcy (another and more common measure of indirect costs), the expenses submitted to and approved by the bankruptcy court (a measure of direct costs), and the recovery rates for creditors and APR violations. Our most important findings are that Chapter 7 liquidations are not cheaper than Chapter 11 reorganizations, particularly after we control for endogenous self-selection of firms into bankruptcy procedure. Bankruptcy professionals (attorneys, accountants, trustees) regularly end up with most of the post-bankruptcy firm’s value in Chapter 7. ∗ Arturo Bris is at IMD Yale School of Management, and ECGI. Ivo Welch is at Brown Uni
What problem does this paper attempt to address?