Clonality Status and Clinicopathologic Features of Hepatocellular Adenoma

GONG Li,SU Qin,ZHANG Wei,LI Ai-ning,ZHU Shao-jun,FENG Ying-ming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2006.08.003
2006-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective:A case of hepatocellular adenoma(HA) was described with special respect to its clonality status,pathogenic factors and differential diagnosis.Methods: The case was examined by histopathology,immunohistochemistry and a clonality assay based on X-chromosomal inactivation mosaicism in female somatic tissues and polymorphism at the androgen receptor focus.The clinicopathologic features of the reported cases from China and other countries were compared.Results: The lesion was composed of cells arranged in cords,most of which were two-cell-thick and separated by sinusoids.The tumor cells were similar morphologically to the rounding liver parenchyma cells.Mitosis was not found.No portal tract,central vein or bile duct was observed within the lesion.The tumor tissues showed a positive reaction for cytokeratin(CK) 18,but not for CK19 and vimentin.Monoclonality was demonstrated for the lesion,confirming the diagnosis of HA.Clinicopathologic data of the 127 HA cases reported from China and 130 from Western countries were compared,with the male/female ratios being 1.76/1 and 1/2.9,respectively.Only 3.9% of the Chinese patients had a history of administration of oral contraceptives,the percentage being markedly lower than that of the patents from the western countries.Conclusion: A case of HA was reported,with its monoclonality demonstrated clearly.The reported cases from China and from western countries are different regarding their gender distribution and pathogenic factors.Other lesions,including focal nodular hyperplasia(FNH) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma should be excluded before making the diagnosis.For the distinction between HA and FNH, clonality analysis is helpful.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?