Abstract:Background Shoulder function often is limited after tumor resection and endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. This is partly attributable to the inability to reliably reattach rotator cuff tendons to the prosthesis and achieve adequate shoulder capsule repair with a metallic prosthesis. An option to attain these goals is to use synthetic mesh for the reconstruction, although the value of this method has not been well documented in the literature. Questions/purposes We asked whether patients who had shoulder reconstruction using synthetic mesh had (1) better shoulder function; (2) improved ROM compared with shoulder reconstructions without mesh; and (3) more stable joints compared with those in patients with similar resections who had reconstructions without synthetic mesh. Methods During a 5-year period, we performed 41 intraarticular resections with endoprosthetic reconstructions for malignancies in the proximal humerus meeting specified criteria to generate similarity in the study groups. Twelve patients (29%) were lost to followup before 24 months, leaving 29 patients available for review at a mean of 45 months (range, 24–70 months). This retrospective study compared 14 patients with soft tissue reconstruction that included synthetic mesh with 15 patients with soft tissue reconstruction without the use of synthetic mesh. The choice was made during consultation between the patient and surgeon, after reviewing the perceived advantages and disadvantages of each approach. A tumor band (ligament advanced reinforcement system) was used as synthetic mesh and wrapped around the prosthesis of the proximal humerus for soft tissue reconstruction in the reconstruction-with-mesh group. Study endpoints included the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) function scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, shoulder ROM, and proximal migration of the humeral prosthesis. Results The mean MSTS score for patients without synthetic mesh reconstruction was 20 ± 3 points (66%), whereas for patients with synthetic mesh reconstruction, the mean score was 24 ± 2 points (79%; p = 0.001). Patients with synthetic mesh reconstruction had a higher mean total ASES score (85 ± 1.1 points versus 72 ±1.7 points; p = 0.025), and better function for activities of daily living. They also had better ROM on mean active forward flexion (p = 0.020), abduction (p < 0.001), and external rotation (p < 0.001) than patients without synthetic mesh reconstruction. Proximal migration of the prosthesis was observed in five of 15 of patients in the group without synthetic mesh reconstruction and in none of those treated with synthetic mesh (p = 0.042). Conclusions Patients with intraarticular resection and endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus with reconstruction that included synthetic mesh had better shoulder function and ROM, and more stable joints than patients who had reconstruction without synthetic mesh. This result supports prior observations by others and it remains to be shown whether use of the ligament advanced reconstruction system is superior to other types of mesh or other types of reconstructions. Further investigation is needed but our results indicate that using mesh should be considered for patients with tumor resection and endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Reconstruction of Shoulder Joint Capsule with Prolene PMH to Prevent Prosthesis Dislocation after Artificial Humeral Head Replacement for Proximal Humeral Malignant Tumor

Mesh patch and anchors can improve clinical results of prosthetic replacement after resection of primary proximal humerus malignant tumor

Synthetic Mesh Improves Shoulder Function After Intraarticular Resection and Prosthetic Replacement of Proximal Humerus

Repairing bone and joint defect after tumor excision with allograft/prosthetic composite arthroplasty

[Limb Preservation Surgery Combined with Perioperative Rehabilitation for the Treatment of 7 Patients with Stage II to III Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in the Proximal Humerus].

Plate-prosthesis composite reconstruction after large segmental resection of proximal humeral tumors

Malawer type I/V proximal humerus reconstruction after tumor resection: a systematic review

Artificial Semi-Shoulder Joint Replacement for Humerus Proximal Fractures

The Short-Term Function of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty after Resection of the Proximal Humerus Bone Tumour

Different fixation methods for artificial femoral head replacement: A biomechanical comparison of joint stability

Surgical treatment ofproximal humeral fractures

Design and function evaluation of 3D-printed hemi-elbow-arthroplastic total humeral prosthesis

Total Humeral Endoprosthetic Replacement following Excision of Malignant Bone Tumors

[Enhancing Soft-tissue Reattachment with Artificial Mesh in Joint Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Bone Tumors]

Plate-prosthesis Composite Reconstruction after Large Segmental Resection of Proximal Humeral Tumors: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Intercalary prosthetic replacement is a reliable solution for metastatic humeral shaft fractures: retrospective, observational study of a single center series

Treatment of proxlmal humeral fractures with Cable-needle internal implant cerclage T-shaped compression fixation of tuberosity during humeral prosthesis replacement

Complications and functional outcomes after reconstruction of the proximal humerus with allograft-prosthetic composite: a systematic review of the literature

Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus with the Clavicle after Tumor Resection

Primary Partial Humeral Head Resurfacing

The clinical benefits of reconstructing the medial column support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures