Perioperative safety comparison between two reconstruction methods in treating patients with metastases of proximal femur

YANG Yi,GUO Wei,WEI Ran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1439.2013.06-004
2013-01-01
Abstract:Background:Selecting the reconstruction method for resection of the metastases of proximal femur needs an overall consideration of various factors,among which the biological behavior of the primary tumor,the damage scope of the fumer lesion,the general condition of the patient,and the perioperative risk deserve the most consideration.Objective:To compare the perioperative safety and early function of the intramedullary nail/plate internal fixation and the prosthesis replacement in treating patients with metastases of proximal femur.Methods:The perioperative clinical data(the follow-up data is complete) of 88 patients with proximal femoral metastatic lesions who received surgical treatment in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2003 to December 2011 was retrospectively analyzed.The age of these patients varied from 15 to 87 years old,with a median age of 58.The mean estimated survival time was 10.26 months.Classified by the reconstruction method,the patients were divided into two groups:the intramedullary nail/plate internal fixation group(33 cases) and the prosthesis replacement group(55 cases).The perioperative blood loss,the duration of the surgery,the perioperative complications,and the postoperative early functions of the two groups were compared.Results:The mean follow-up period was 8.74 months(1-44 months).Perioperative factors such as the duration of the surgery(P=0.173),perioperative complications(χ 2 =0.014,P=0.905),and the postoperative early functions(P=0.777) of the two groups showed no significant difference.One case in the intramedullary nail/plate internal fixation group died of multiple organ failure 3 weeks later after the surgery.The blood loss of the prosthesis replacement group was significantly less than the intramedullary nail/plate internal fixation group(P=0.043).Conclusions:Both prosthesis replacement and intramedullary nail/plate internal fixation are important operation methods in treating the metastases of proximal femur.These two reconstruction methods have no significant differences in the perioperative complications and the postoperative early functions.However,as the intramedullary nail/plate internal fixation has a higher future failure rate,it is better to select the prosthesis replacement for patients with an estimated longer survival time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?