Abstract:Accumulating evidence suggests that transformational leadership is positively associated with such leadership effectiveness as job satisfaction,organizational commitment,job performance,and OCB.However few studies have examined relations between the components of transformational leadership and different work outcomes.Also the mechanisms and processes by which transformational leadership exerts its influence have not been adequately addressed in the literature.More work is also needed to examine constructs that may mediate the linkage between transformational leadership and work outcomes.As proposed by Vandeenberghe(1999),psychological empowerment may be a powerful mediator of transformational leadership effects.In the present study,we explored the relations among different components of transformational leadership and job satisfaction and organizational commitment in a Chinese context.We also examined the contribution of each of the four dimensions of Thomas and Velthouse's(1990) multidimensional conceptualization of psychological empowerment in mediating the relation between transformational leadership and job satisfaction,and organizational commitment. The following measures were administered to a sample of 744 employees from 14 companies: The Transformational Leadership Questionnaire(TLQ) developed by Li and Shi(2005);the Psychological Empowerment Scale(PES) developed by Spreitzer(1995);the Job Satisfaction Scale developed by Tsui,Egan and O'Reilly III(1992),and the Affective Commitment Scale developed by Allen and Meyer(1996).All scales were subjected to reliability analysis and factor analysis before data analysis.Internal consistency reliability estimates ranged from 0.69 to 0.89,suggesting adequate reliability.Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) results supported the four-dimension structure(morale modeling,visionary motivating,charisma and individualized consideration) of the TLQ.CFA results also confirmed the four-dimension(meaning,competence,self-determination and impact) structure of the PES.Finally,exploratory factor analysis extracted one factor from the job satisfaction items and a single factor was also extracted from the affective commitment items. Structure equations modeling(SEM) was used to explore the relations among transformational leadership,psychological empowerment,job satisfaction and organizational commitment using the model generation strategy described by Jreskog & Srbom(1996).The data were randomly split into two parts.One part was submitted to an exploratory SEM and the other part was submitted to a confirmatory SEM.The exploratory SEM began with a fully-mediated model in which the components of psychological empowerment fully mediated the relations between the components of transformational leadership and job satisfaction and organizational commitment.Some meaningful adjustment was made according to the modification index (MI) generated by AMOS 4.0 until a statistically acceptable model was derived.This model was then submitted to a confirmatory SEM which yielded satisfactory goodness of fit statistics,including χ~2 /df,GFI,NFI,IFI,TLI,and CFI. The results showed that different components of transformational leadership had different impact on job satisfaction and organizational commitment.Specifically,morale modeling and visionary motivating were powerful predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment,respectively;charisma and individualized consideration were robust predictors of job satisfaction but not of organizational commitment.To some extent,psychological empowerment mediated the relation between transformational leadership and employee work attitude.Specifically,meaning mediated the relation between visionary motivation and job satisfaction as well as organizational commitment.Meaning also mediated the relation between moral modeling and job satisfaction and organizational commitment.Similarly, competence mediated the relation between visionary motivation and organizational commitment.However,neither self-determination nor impact mediated the relation between components of transformational leadership and job satisfaction or organizational commitment.And non-component of psychological empowerment mediated the relation between charisma and individualized consideration and job satisfaction.Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

Aggregative Multidimensional Construct for Organizational Motivation in Multi-perspectives

A multidimensional concept model on the perceived organizational support for Chinese employee

Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems

Does Supportive Human Resource Practice Make Employee Speak Without Reservation? Perspective of Behavioral Motivation

An Integrated Study of Workplace Aggression:Combining the Multiple Dimensions

The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries

Differential moderating effects of collectivistic and power distance orientations on the effectiveness of work motivators

Transformational Leadership and Employee Work Attitudes:The Mediating Effects of Multidimensional Psychological Empowerment

A contingency perspective of pro-organizational motives, unethical pro-organizational behavior, and organizational citizenship behavior

Three Characteristics of Motivation:--A New Motivation Perspective

A Profile Approach to Self-Determination Theory Motivations at Work.

Why employees commit? A multilevel study of the effects of autonomy supportive climate and adaptability

Too many motives? The interactive effects of multiple motives on organizational citizenship behavior.

The Motivational Mechanism of Pay Satisfaction:Relationship Between Social Comparison,Organizational Justice and Pay Satisfaction

Revisiting the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (MWMS)

From Motivation to Organizational Identity of Members in Non-profit Organizations: The Role of Collectivism

Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation

Intermediary and Staff Motivation

Do Motives Contribute to Sustainable Supply Chain Management? A Motive–Ability–Opportunity Triangle Research Perspective

Mark his motives: A motivational attribution perspective on observer responses to peer helping behaviors