Abstract:<p>This article is concerned about the test for the difference in the distributions of multigroup proportional data, which is motivated by the problem of comparing the distributions of quality of life (QoL) outcomes among different treatment groups in clinical trials. The proportional data, such as QoL outcomes assessed by answers to questions on a questionnaire, are bounded in a closed interval such as [0,1] with continuous observations in (0,1) and, in addition, excess observations taking the boundary values 0 and/or 1. Common statistical procedures used in practice, such as <i>t</i>‐ and rank‐based tests, may not be very powerful since they ignore the specific feature of the proportional data. In this article, we propose a three‐component mixture model for the proportional data and a density ratio model for the distributions of continuous observations in (0,1). A semiparametric test statistic for the homogeneity of distributions of multigroup proportional data is derived based on the empirical likelihood ratio principle and shown to be asymptotically distributed as a chi‐squared random variable under null hypothesis. A nonparametric bootstrap procedure is proposed to further improve the performance of the semiparametric test. Simulation studies are performed to evaluate the empirical type I error and power of the proposed test procedure and compare it with likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) under parametric distribution assumptions, rank‐based Kruskal‐Wallis test, and Wald‐type test. The proposed test procedure is also applied to the analysis of QoL outcomes from a clinical trial on colorectal cancer that motivated our study.</p>

Comparison of Correlated Proportions Based on Paired Binary Data from Clustered Samples

A Comparative Review of Methods for Comparing Means Using Partially Paired Data

Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

Intrinsic tests for the equality of two correlated proportions

Testing Homogeneity of Proportion Ratios for Stratified Bilateral Correlated Data

Comparison of paired ordinal data with mis-classification and covariates adjustment

Homogeneity Test of Ratios of Two Proportions in Stratified Bilateral and Unilateral Data

A comparison of methods for the analysis of binomial proportion data in behavioral research

Testing the Equality of Proportions for Combined Unilateral and Bilateral Data

Statistical Tests for Proportion Difference in One-to-Two Matched Binary Diagnostic Data: Application to Environmental Testing of Salmonella in the United States

Multiple Comparisons Using Composite Likelihood in Clustered Data

Power Comparisons in 2x2 Contingency Tables: Odds Ratio versus Pearson Correlation versus Canonical Correlation

Testing homogeneity of proportions from sparse binomial data with a large number of groups

Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data

Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design

[Protein C--possible usefulness as a therapeutic weapon].

A bootstrap semiparametric homogeneity test for the distributions of multigroup proportional data, with applications to analysis of quality of life outcomes in clinical trials

A puzzle of proportions: Two popular Bayesian tests can yield dramatically different conclusions

Testing the homogeneity of odds ratio across strata for combined bilateral and unilateral data

Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

Comparison of Statistical Methods for Analysis of Threshold Model of Two-Stage Clustered Randomized Data