Abstract:Each year more than 2 million people from all over the world attend the Hajj pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. At least 60% of them develop respiratory symptoms there or during outward or homebound transit [1, 2]. During recent interpandemic years, approximately 1 in 10 pilgrims with respiratory symptoms in Makkah have had influenza detected by polymerase chain reaction tests of respiratory samples [3, 4]. Pneumonia is the leading cause of hospitalization at Hajj, accounting for approximately 20% of diagnoses on admission [5]. Hajj 2009 took place in November in the middle of the influenza A H1N1 pandemic (pH1N1). However, a recent report suggests that the prevalence of pH1N1 was 0.2% (n 5 1) among 519 arriving pilgrims and 0.1% (n 5 2) among 2699 departing pilgrims [6], probably because of heightened infection control and preexisting crossimmunity among pilgrims, most of whom would have been exposed to H1N1 before 1957 [7]. Experience from an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic in Makkah suggested that only 77 of 3087 patients (2.5%) who attended with ENT symptoms had suspected pH1N1 based on history of contact with a patient with pH1N1 and clinical symptoms of influenza-like illness (ILI); however, laboratory testing for influenza virus was not undertaken [8]. The efficacy of influenza vaccine is dependent on matching the vaccine and circulating influenza strains. Because the pH1N1 vaccine was not largely available in time for Hajj 2009, protection was dependent on previous exposure to H1N1 influenza A virus and nonpharmaceutical interventions such as face masks [2]. Historically, face masks have been used to prevent or reduce nosocomial transmission of pandemic influenza since, at least, the time of Spanish influenza in 1918. Nurses who wore specially designed face masks and changed them every 2 hours experienced lower infection rates than those who did not [9]. Recent experiments confirm that surgical masks and respirators can filter influenza virus, although observational studies or clinical trials have not yet clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of plain surgical masks in household or healthcare settings [10–16]. The role of surgical masks, respirators, and/or hand hygiene in preventing ILI has been examined in at least 15 studies including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These compared ‘‘plain surgical mask’’ with ‘‘no intervention’’ against ILI [10–14]. In 4 of these RCTs influenza was laboratory confirmed [10–13]. Metadata from these studies indicated that wearing surgical masks did not change the frequency of laboratoryconfirmed influenza (Figure 1). The findings may have been due to limitations and biases in study design [10– 14]. A common limitation of all studies was small sample size. Despite similar study design, the sample-size calculations were based on different assumptions, and the studies lacked the power to detect a difference in incidence of laboratoryconfirmed influenza. At least 2 observational studies at the Hajj have examined the role of masks in preventing acute respiratory infection. One of these studies evaluated the role of face masks among pilgrims at the 2002 Hajj [15], when a protective effect was shown in men but not in women. The other study evaluated the use of face masks worn by healthcare workers at the 2005 Hajj in preventing acquisition of acute respiratory infection when protective effectiveness was nonsignificant [16]. The Hajj congregation of more than 2 million people who stay for 5 days in 25 000 tents in Mina, a valley within Makkah city, provides a unique opportunity to conduct RCTs of mask effectiveness to avoid sample size and design limitations. During Hajj 2011 the 5-day stay in Mina is from 4 to 8 November. We are undertaking a pilot study to examine the feasibility of a cluster RCT of mask use among Australian pilgrims. Assuming success of this pilot trial, we plan to set up large RCT involving pilgrims from several countries in subsequent years. We are seeking expressions of interest for a multinational collaboration and would be pleased to hear from possible collaborators.

Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Growth in China under the Binding of Resource and Environment

Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity under the Distortion of the Factor Market in China

Public Investment, Environmental Regulation, and the Sustainable Development of Agriculture in China Based on the Decomposition of Green Total Factor Productivity

Evaluation and Influencing Factors of China’s Agricultural Productivity from the Perspective of Environmental Constraints

Measurement of total factor productivity of green agriculture in China: Analysis of the regional differences based on China

Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Agriculture Green Total Factor Productivity in China, 1998–2016: Based on More Sophisticated Calculations of Carbon Emissions

Measuring green total factor productivity of China's agricultural sector: A three-stage SBM-DEA model with non-point source pollution and CO2 emissions

Sources of Total-Factor Productivity and Efficiency Changes in China’s Agriculture

Measuring China's agricultural green total factor productivity and its drivers during 1998–2019

How does agricultural production agglomeration affect green total factor productivity?: empirical evidence from China

Unmasking masks in Makkah: preventing influenza at Hajj.

China's agricultural green total factor productivity based on carbon emission: An analysis of evolution trend and influencing factors

Measuring Agricultural Total Factor Productivity in China: Pattern and Drivers over the Period of 1978‐2016

Administration or marketization: Environmental regulation, marketization and agricultural green total factor productivity

The Production Performance of China's Transforming Agriculture

Agricultural production agglomeration and total factor carbon productivity: based on NDDF–MML index analysis

Dynamic and static analysis of agricultural productivity in China

Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in Shandong Province of China

Role of China's agricultural water policy reforms and production technology heterogeneity on agriculture water usage efficiency and total factor productivity change

A not‐so‐harmless experiment in predatory open access publishing