A school-based indicated prevention study for suicide in adolescents with high risk

YANG Jing-jie,XIE Bin,ZHU Zi-qing,ZHANG Qi,PENG Yong-wen,HAN Hai-ling,BIAN Qian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.16.042
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an indicated suicide prevention program on suicide behaviors and related factors in high suicide risk students.Methods A total of 210 students were screened as high suicide risk students in grade 7,8,10,11 in Pudong district,Shanghai.All students were randomly assigned into the study group or control group by class level.A suicide prevention program was conducted in study group.Both the study group and control group completed the self-administered questionnaires before and 6 months after the intervention.Results No significant difference was found in suicide behaviors and related factors in the pre-intervention test between two groups(P>0.05)except the score of self-expression(P=0.012).In the follow-up of 6 months in the end of intervention,in the study group suicide behaviors(P=0.000,0.000,0.006),BSI-CV score in the recent week and in the worst(P=0.000,0.003),BDI score(P=0.000),BHS total score and its factors score of future feeling and loss of motivation(P=0.015,0.040,0.020)were significant lower in the 6 months than in the pre-intervention;however,SSRS score and factor scores of subjective and objective support(P=0.000),self-expression score(P=0.017)and stress management score(P=0.042)in ESAP were significant higher.In the control group suicide behaviors(P=0.000,0.002,0.008)and BDI score(P=0.000)were significant lower,but SSRS score(P=0.042)and factor score of subjective support(P=0.001),positive coping score in SCSQ(P=0.009)were significant higher in the 6 months than in the pre-intervention.No significant difference was found between two groups in the above mentioned variables except that the score of objective support of SSRS and score of self-expression were higher in the study group than in the control group,BSI-CV score in the recent week was lower in the study group than in the control group at the 6-month follow-up.Conclusions In the current follow-up time,our intervention can only improve parts of suicide behaviors and their related risk factors in the students with high suicide risk.It may implicate that we prolong follow-up to maximum the effectiveness of intervention program.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?