Abstract:In the Qing Dynasty, the dispute between Jinwenand Guwen was a part of the disputes of Sinology between Neo-Confucianism, and the dispute evolved into a pivot of political and academic transformation in the late Qing and early Republic of China.With a view to reforming the ritual system by returning to the ancient political system, the movement which reexamine Chinese studies from disciplinary perspectives and discussed ancient history focused on differentiating and analyzing classics documents in order to eliminate the rationality of the political and educational system in Confucian ethics and rites.In the modern time, the New Culture generation of scholars promoted the historiography of classics.However, it is necessary to further probe into the academic division within traditional Chinese scholarship, and to study how the academic methods, issues and ideas inherited by scholars of different schools were developed and transcended by scholars of the Republic of China, leading to a pluralistic path in response to the integration of Chinese and western civilizations.In the 1930s, the historiography of classics had become a foregone conclusion.How to transcend the dispute of Jinwen and Guwen and deal with the ideas, methods and materials of classics in the way of history became the focus of the academic circle, thus opening a new round of controversy between Jinwen and Guwen.Scholars such as Qian Xuantong, Gu Jiegang and Meng Wentong called it ″Beyond the Jinwen″, and this transcendence and transformation became the starting point for scholars to practice new academic studies.In the academic circle of the Republic of China, there were different ways to inherit and surpass traditional Confucian classics.In the historical concept of the Guwen, the Six Classics were regarded as the ancient political documents, and the ancient history was separated from the spirit of Confucianism.The New Culture generation of scholars aimed to construct a course of internal cultural evolution course by means of historiography so as to change the study of classics into historiography, and construct the framework of Chinese cultural history without being limited by the Confucian re-creation of Chinese standard culture.The scholar Hu Shi put forward the idea of ″returning to Liao Ping″ to review the rationality of Liao Ping's division of Jinwen and Guwen by the system of rites.The scholar Qian Mu traced the academic evolution of Qin and Han Dynasties by historical facts, solved the dispute between Jinwen and Guwen, and was opposed to forced similarities and differences in the classics.Qian Xuantong and Gu Jiegang took a perspective of explicatory and analytical study, further historicized the issue of Jinwenand Guwen, and advocated going beyond the dispute over Jinwenand Guwen.Gu Jiegang advocated that Beyond the Jinwenshould absorb the criticism of Neo-Confucianism and the textual research of Sinology, so as to get rid of the old and bring forth the new, and clarify the evolution of Chinese history and culture.Based on Jinwen, Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng emphasized the dynamic interaction of Classics, institution, and historical facts, and examine the sciences from a Chinese-studies perspective.They attempted to carry forward the New Confucianism of Qin and Han Dynasties to establish the core values of Chinese civilization and construct the dynamic relationship between Confucianism and historical evolution.They started the Confucianism-oriented historiography in the modern academic context.By examining the historical context in which various schools of thought have transcended the debate between Jinwenand Guwen, and by integrating methods and objectives, we can not only examine the complex connotation of the transformation of modern classics and history, but also reflect on and enrich the methods and significance of current historical studies, in order to turn historical studies into the source of the subjectivity of civilization.

Scholars of the Older Generation in the Republican Period

Beyond the Jinwenand the Transformation from Classics to Historiography in Modern China

Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and Orientation of Confucianism under the Background of ″National Calamity″

The Research on the Mainstream Criticism of Academics in the Han Dynasty

The Orientation of Republican Scholars toward Study of the Song Dynasty and Their Dilemma

On the Mentality of Modern Chinese Intellectuals and Social Thoughts——A Diachronic Study from the Period of the Late Qing Dynasty and Early Years of the Chinese Republic to the May Fourth Movement

The Xueheng School (), Babbitt’s New Humanism, and the May Fourth Movement ()

The Tongcheng School and the social thought of the late Qing dynasty

Scholars' State of Mind in Great Educational Changes——Reading Notes on "Diary of Yun Yuding in Cheng Zhai"

An Analysis of Early Republican "Intellectual Circles":Press Media and the Life Style of Intellectuals

Trends and Changes in New Historiography of Modern China

Walking Between the Chinese and Western Cultures as well as the Old and New: Studies of the Teaching of Chinese Around the May Fourth Movement in Tsinghua College

The Studies of the Great Series of the Chinese New Literature and Literary Orientation of May Fourth Movement Writers

A New Trend in the "national Studies Fever" of the Post-May Fourth Era

Classwork and Saving the Nation:Understanding the Richness of "May Fourth" through the Observations of Contemporary Faculty Members

Jin Yufu and the Division and Merging of the Southern and Northern Styles of Study

The May Fourth Intelligentsia:Center and Periphery——A Case Study of Reading La Jeunesse and the New Culture Movement

Rupture, Revolution, and Rhetoric in the Disciplinary Formation of Classical Studies in Contemporary China

Nationalism, Citizenship, and the Old Text/New Text Controversy in Late Nineteenth Century China

On the Achievement of Manchu Minority Scholars about Confucian Classics in Qing Dynasty

Some Issues on Cultural Research