Combined Æ fetoprotein testing and ultrasonography as a screening test for primary liver cancer

Boheng Zhang,Binghui Yang
1999-01-01
Abstract:Objective—To assess the validity and cost of a screening test for primary liver cancer using combined serum Æ fetopro- tein testing and ultrasonography. Setting—An urban community in Shang- hai, China. Methods—9373 subjects aged 35 to 59 with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or chronic hepatitis were stud- ied. Outcome measures were detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value, the cost for each primary liver cancer detected, and the average cost of detecting each additional primary liver cancer by the combined method. The number of small primary liver cancers detected was used for the economic evalu- ation. Results—20 294 screening examinations were carried out. Primary liver cancer was detected in 51 subjects, 36 of whom had small primary liver cancer. When Æ fetoprotein and ultrasonography were used in parallel the detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value were 92%, 7.5%, and 3.0%, respectively; the cost for each primary liver cancer detected was 30 206 RMB (Chinese cur- rency, $3639). When ultrasonography was used alone the detection rate, false posi- tive rate, and positive predictive value were 84%, 2.9%, and 6.6%, respectively; the cost for each primary liver cancer detected was 16 451 RMB ($1982). When the Æ fetoprotein test was used alone the detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value were 69%, 5.0%, and 3.3%, respectively; the cost for each primary liver cancer detected was 25 139 RMB ($3029). Conclusion—The combination of both screening methods results in a relatively small increase in detection but a consider- ably higher false positive rate, increasing the costs. The combined test may be the best choice for primary liver cancer screening in developed areas of China, but otherwise, ultrasonography alone is the method of choice. (J Med Screen 1999;6:108-110)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?