Influences of Special Syntactic Cues on False Belief Understanding in 3- and 4-year-olds

Mo Shuliang,Su Yanjie,Zhang Yaxu

2007-01-01

Acta Psychologica Sinica

Abstract:Introduction Language skills play an important role in the development of theory of mind in children. According to de Villiers, mastery of the syntax of complementation is a prerequisite for successful false-belief performance because it provides a powerful framework for children's representation of false belief state.However, some researchers do not agree with this view. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of complement syntax on false-belief performance in Chinese preschoolers. Following de Villiers, we hypothesized that (1) providing the complement syntactic framework that included a mental verb should improve children's performance in false belief tasks, and (2) the special syntactic cues should have different effects for the unexpected contents task and the unseen displacement task, despite the fact that they are both false belief tasks. Method Four false belief tasks were administered to a total of 124 3- and 4-year-old preschoolers. Each age group was divided into three subgroups, in which three types of special syntactic cues were manipulated. These syntax-cuing conditions were called zero level, first level and second level cuing respectively. The participants were not given any syntactic cues in the zero level condition. Those in the first level condition were given an incomplete syntactic cue, such as “where did the boy (a character in the false belief task) think the chocolate was?” The second level subgroup was given a complete syntactic cue, such as "the boy thought that the chocolate was in the cupboard." In each false belief task, the participants were asked a prediction question as well as an explanation question. One score was given for each correct answer. Results and Conclusion Results and Conclusion.It was shown that children's performance of the false belief tasks in the first and second level syntax-cuing conditions was significantly better than that in the zero level condition. However, there was no significant difference between the first and the second level conditions, or between the unexpected contents and the unseen displacement tasks. A similar pattern was found when comparing children's performance on prediction questions and explanation questions. These findings indicate that the special syntactic cues significantly facilitate children's false belief performance. Finally, the role of the special syntax in false belief understanding was discussed in this paper.