Ternary nucleation of HSO4, NH3, and in the atmosphere

P. Korhonen,M. Kulmala,A. Laaksonen,Y. Viisanen,R. McGraw,J. H. Seinfeld
1999-01-01
Abstract:Classical theory of binary homogeneous nucleation is extended to the ternary system H2SO4-NH3-H20. For NH3 mixing ratios exceeding about 1 ppt, the presence of NH3 enhances the binary H2SO4-H20 nucleation rate by several orders of magnitude. The Gibbs free energies of formation of the critical H2SO4-NH3-H20 cluster, as calculated by two independent approaches, are in substantial agreement. The finding that the H2SO4-NH3-H20 ternary nucleation rate is independ- ent of relative humidity over a large range of H2SO4 concentrations has wide atmospheric consequences. The limiting component for ternary H2SO4-NH3-H20 nucleation is, as in the binary H2SO4-H20 case, H2SO4; however, the H2SO4 concentration needed to achieve significant nuclea- tion rates is several orders of magnitude below that required in the binary case. H2SO4 above the solution (e.g., Scott and Cattell, 1979), NH3 is expected to facilitate the nucleation of H2SO4-H20 (Coffman and Hegg, 1995). In this paper, we present a classical theory of the ternary nucleation of H2SO4-NH3-H20. We compare predicted rates of nucleation in the ternary system to those of the binary H2SO4- H20 system at atmospheric levels of H2SO4 and NH3. One cau- tion should be noted in regard to this and other treatments of nucleation based on the classical theory. Whereas some labo- ratory nucleation rate measurements do not agree with classical theory predictions, others do; for example, the recent parameterization of H2SO4-H20 nucleation theory (Kulmala et al., 1998) agrees with laboratory measurements of Viisanen et al. (1997). Although molecular-based theories that address limitations of classical theory are a subject of current atten- tion (Kusaka et al., 1998), at present a predictive molecular theory of binary nucleation does not exist. Thus a classical theory still represents the standard for atmospheric applica- tion and that against which molecular theories will ultimately be compared.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?