Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

Four Contradictions Constraining China's Foreign Policy Behavior

Harmonising The Management Of Foreign And Domestic Affairs In Chinese Foreign Policy

On China's Lack of Theories Regarding its Participation in the Construction of International Organizations

The Logic of Contingency in China’s Insistence on the Non-interference Principle

China’s New Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping

Diverse Multilateralism: Four Strategies in China'S Multilateral Diplomacy

China Debates the Non-Interference Principle

Contending Ideas on China's Non-Alliance Strategy

The Influence of Traditional Culture on Contemporary Chinese Diplomacy

On China’s Modern Foreign Policy Through the Prism of the Concepts of “Dao” and “Shi”

Chinese Foreign Relations Grand Strategies: From Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping

Confucian Foreign Policy Traditions in Chinese History

From One-Level Games to Two-Level Games:The Evolution of China’s Foreign Policy-Making Model

COMPREHENSION OF “GREAT POWER DIPLOMACY WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS”. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES

China's Foreign Policy(1978-2008): Some Thoughts on Its Progress and Insufficiency

China's New Foreign Policy: Not Conflict but Convergence of Interests

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

The Logical Contradictions of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response

«To Tell about China»

Foreign Policy of China and the United States' Imposition of a Bipolar Confrontation on China

The economy-security conundrum in American grand strategy: foreign economic policy toward China from Obama to Biden