Limb-sparing resections for malignant tumors of shoulder girdle:11-year experience of classical or modified tikhoff-linberg procedures in a single institution
Lu Xie,Wei Guo,Xiaodong Tang,Rong Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2015.01.009
2015-01-01
Abstract:Background We evaluated the functional and oncologic outcome of 33 patients with malignant tumors of the shoulder girdle who were managed with classical or modified Tikhoff-Linberg procedures in our centre so as to compare the influence of different methods of soft tissue reconstruction on the function of upper limbs and to share some experience in limb-sparing operations for malignant tumors of shoulder girdle.Methods From July 1st 2001 to September 30th 2013,one hundred and ninety-four consecutive patients who had resection of tumors around shoulder girdle were reviewed.The tumors originated from the proximal humerus in 130 patients,scapula in 40 and circumambient soft tissue in 21.Preoperatively,in addition to general routine examinations,X-ray radiography,CT and MRI of the tumors,chest CT and ECT scanning were all performed in those patients.Angiography was added if there was neurovascular (brachial plexus and axillary vessels) involvement.The inclusion criteria contained:(1 )patients had classical or modified Tikhoff-Linberg procedures (Malawer Type Ⅳ,Ⅵ or Ⅴ)in our centre;(2)patients were firstly treated in our centre and they had not undergone any kind of biopsy or operation of the shoulder girdle before;(3 )the proximal humerus or the humeral head were resected with total or partial scapular extraarticularly. Patients who had amputation,intraarticular total scapulectomy,or proximal humerus resection without glenoid resection were excluded.Thirty-five patients were included in this study,but two patients who lost follow-up were excluded.According to the classifications of shoulder girdle resections of Malawer et al.,7 patients had extraarticular proximal humerus and partial scapular resection (type Ⅴ ),21 patients had extraarticular humeral head and total scapular resection (type Ⅳ)and 5 patients had extraarticular proximal humeral and total scapular resection (type Ⅵ).There were 1 1 female and 22 male with average age of 43 years old (range,1 7 to 82 y).All patients were followed up for a mean of 34 months (range,6 to 109 months).The pathologic diagnosis obtained by needle or open biopsies included 10 metastatic tumors (4 from lung cancer,3 from breast cancer,1 from thyroid cancer and 2 from unknown origin),7 chondrosarcomas,4 osteosarcomas,3 Ewing sarcoma/PNET,3 synovial sarcomas,2 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors,1 malignant fibrous histocytoma,1 fibrous sarcoma,1 liposarcoma and 1 malignant hemangiopericytoma.The stage and extent of the tumor were evaluated according to the Enneking system.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to patients with osteosarcoma,Ewing's sarcoma/PNET and partial malignant soft tissue sarcoma.As for other anatomical sites,limb salvage procedures for bone tumors of the shoulder girdle comprise three steps:complete resection of tumors,reconstruction of bone defects and good soft tissue covering.According to the surgical classification system proposed by Linberg and Malawer et al,classical Tikhoff-Linberg resection (also called shoulder girdle resection Malawer type Ⅳ )contained extraarticular en bloc resection of proximal humerus or humeral head,glenohumeral joint,the whole scapular and lateral clavicle.While modified Tikhoff-Linberg procedure (Malawer type Ⅴ)meant extra-articular resection of proximal humerus,glenohumeral joint,lateral clavicle and the neck of scapular glenoid.The surgical margins of the resected tumor were grossly and microscopically evaluated by two different experienced pathologists respectively.If they disagreed in opinion,the margins would be judged by another doctor who usually would be a senior pathologist.Results All those 33 patients survived the perioperative period and were followed up clinically after surgery (mean follow-up time 34 m,range 6 to 109 m).At the final follow-up,6 patients were alive without evidence of disease,2 patients remained alive but with disease,and 25 had died of their disease.In patients with metastatic bone tumor,9 had died of their disease and 1 were alive with disease.Local recurrence developed in 2 patients with chondrosarcomas, 1 patient with osteosarcoma,1 patient with malignant schwannoma and 1 patient with synovial sarcoma.The 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 81.8% and 41.4% respectively by the Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis (SPSS v 1 7.0;SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL)and the median survival time was 31 month.Early complications related to tumor resection occurred in 3 patients.One patient presented with temporary radial nerve palsy postoperatively,and fully recovered after 4 months of conservative treatment.Two patients who received radiotherapy before operation (doses of the radiotherapy were above 45 Gy)presented with delayed wound healing.They received debridements and got healed two weeks later.One patient who received constrained scapular prosthetic replacement had prosthesis dislocation 20 months after surgery while another female patient with proximal humeral prosthetic replacement had anterior subluxation four months after surgery (Fig.6 ).Although the shoulder joint revision surgery was only carried out for the former patient,those two patients had satisfactory manual dexterity and did not affect much of their daily lives.For all patients at the final follow-up,the average MSTS 93 score was 1 7.6 of 30 points (59%;range,0%-80%).Pain was relieved in most patients,with a mean score of 4.4(87.5%).High scores were achieved in emotional acceptance and hand dexterity,with an average of 4.1 (82.5%)and 4.3 (86.3%),respectively.The abduction of shoulder was restricted severely,only 6 patients could position their hands above the waist on front plane.The ranges of active shoulder abduction and forward flexion motion were 0°-40° and 10°-45°,respectively.Although normal hand and elbow functions were retained in most patients, limitations in lifting ability and abduction function were reported.The average score for these two items was 1.7 (33.8%)and 1.8 (35%),respectively.We compared the functional outcomes with Muscolo-Skeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)rating scale in different types of resection and did not find any difference in statistical analysis (Wilcoxon test,SPSS v 17.0;SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL)no matter in total points (P = 0.88 ) or in scores of different aspects (Table Ⅲ ).As for soft tissue reconstruction,we also compared the MSTS rating scores between using LARS or not,and there seemed not to have any statistical differences in over-all functional scores (P =0.23)(Wilcoxon test, SPSS v 17.0;SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL)(Table Ⅲ).However of all the detailed functional scores,the manual dexterity tended to be better in the group of using LARS (Wilcoxon test,P = 0.05 ). Conclusion The Tikhoff-Linberg procedure not only provided a feasible method for wide resection of malignant tumors involving shoulder girdle but also preserved much of manual and elbow functions. However the abduction function of the shoulder was poor because the rotator cuff and deltoid had been sacrificed.We have not found any major long-term functional difference either between classical and modified Tikhoff-Linberg procedures or between different soft tissue reconstructions in the follow-up.