Abstract:Although Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) falls short of banning the death penalty outright, it provides for substantive and procedural requirements aimed at limiting imposition of the death penalty before its abolition. Among them is the restriction on the “most serious crimes” in jurisdictions where the death penalty remains lawful (ICCPR Article 6 (2)). Drawing on the case law of the Taiwanese Supreme Court (TSC), this chapter aims to shed socio-legal light on the role that the “most serious crimes” requirement has played in judicial rulings concerning the death penalty since the ICCPR rights became enforceable in Taiwan on 10 December 2009. It is argued that in its translation into Taiwanese judicial practice, the “most serious crimes” requirement has been read together with the domestic legal provision for individualized aggravating and mitigating circumstances under the rubric of rehabilitatibility (教化可能性), deviating from the jurisprudence of the UN human rights bodies. Under the judge-civilizer tradition prevalent in the Taiwanese judiciary, the idea of rehabilitatibility has eventually turned the judicial deliberation on whether to impose the death penalty into a valuation of the worth of the defendant’s life, with a focus on the discovery of the incorrigible offender. With its absorption into the individualizing idea of rehabilitatibility, the “most serious crimes” requirement of the ICCPR has thus become part of the pathology of judicial paternalism, suggesting a mutation of international human rights ideals in Taiwan.

Value Option of the Death Penalty of the United Nations and Chinese Outlet of the Death Penalty Policy

Predictors of Death Penalty Views in China: an Empirical Comparison Between College Students and Citizens

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

Rethinking of the Death Penalty System in China

Choice of Value: Counter- Terrorism Measures and Criminal Procedure——Retrospect and Analysis of the American Counter- Terrorism Law

Retention or Abolition of the Death Penalty and Public Opinion on the Death Penalty

Chinese Public Opinions on Death Penalty: Measurement, Analysis and Communication

Control of Death Penalty by the Due Process——Review the improvement of the death penalty procedure in China from the international standards of Fair Trial

The Debate Over the Death Penalty in Today’s China

Opinions on Retention Versus Abolition of the Death Penalty

Death Sentence with a Two-Year Reprieve Shall Be an Inevitable Due Process

Illuminating and Learning from the "Progressive Abolition of Death Penalty Policy" in Taiwan

On the Death Penalty: From the Chief Editor of <i>Criminal Law Review</i>

A Preliminary Study of Gender Differences in Death Penalty Views of College Students From Bangladesh, China, Nigeria, and the United States

The Fate of the Death Penalty in Modern China

On Ten Deficiencies of Due Process of Death Penalty in China

An Examination of the Death Penalty in China

A Study on the Death Penalty as Applied to Those Engaged in the Transportation of Drugs: Observations on a Letter from a Prisoner Condemned to Death

The death penalty and society in contemporary China

Killing in Your Name: Pathology of Judicial Paternalism and the Mutation of the “Most Serious Crimes” Requirement in Taiwan

On Charateristics of Due Process of Death Penalty