Abstract:The scattering features of points in flow–density plot remain as an attractive topic in the last several decades. Some previous studies either assumed that the points of congested traffic flows were completely random or that the implicit rules of hidden distribution were difficult to describe. Although the scattering features are influenced by various factors (e.g. lane-changing manoeuvers, merging behaviours and driver heterogeneity), we believe that they are mainly dominated by the microscopic headway/spacing distributions. In this paper, we relax the assumption of deterministic headway/spacing in Newell's simplified car-following model and allow random headways/spacings in a homogeneous platoon (vehicles run closely at the same velocity). Further extending the conventional deterministic reciprocal relationship between flow rate and headway, we find that the reciprocal of average headway of a homogeneous platoon and the corresponding flow rate should follow the same distribution. Based on these two extensions, we can link the conditional distributions of average headway in a homogeneous platoon and the conditional distributions of flow rate, all with respect to velocity. When the aggregation time interval is small enough (e.g. 30 s), tests on Performance Measurement System (PeMS) data reveal that the seemingly disorderly scattering points in the macroscopic flow–density plot follow the estimated flow rate distributions from Next Generation Simulation vehicular trajectories. While if the aggregation time interval increases (e.g. to 5 min), the measured vehicles probably pass the loop detectors at different velocities and form heterogeneous platoons. It becomes difficult to find a definite distribution model that can fit average headway/spacing for heterogeneous platoons. However, most points in flow–velocity plot still locate within a certain 2D region, whose boundaries can be obtained from the homogeneous platoon model. Finally, tests on PeMS data verify the estimated boundaries.

Density Dispersion Model of Bus Platoon on the Assumption of Speed-Followed Truncated Normal Distribution

A Platoon Dispersion Model Based on a Truncated Normal Distribution of Speed

Density-Based Mixed Platoon Dispersion Modelling with Truncated Mixed Gaussian Distribution of Speed

Dispersion Model of Platoon Density Based on Truncated Lognormal Distribution of Speed

Platoon dispersion model based on truncated lognormal distribution of speed

Platoon Flow Dispersion Model Based on Truncated Normal Distribution of Speed

Characterising Scattering Features in Flow–density Plots Using a Stochastic Platoon Model

Mixed Platoon Flow Dispersion Model Based on Speed-Truncated Gaussian Mixture Distribution.

Platoon Dispersion Model Based on Mixed Gaussian Distribution of Travel Time

Study of platoon dispersion models

Platoon density dispersion model based on truncated lognormal distribution of speed

A New Platoon Dispersion Model and Its Application

An Arterial Green-Wave Synchronous Coordination Model for Bus and Non-bus Lanes Based on Platoon Dispersion Theory

Capacity of unsignalized intersection with mixed distribution headway

Constant Speed Based Traffic Platoon Dispersion Model in Cross-Sectional Vehicle Infrastructure Communication Environment

Delay model in two-lane traffic flow induced by buses

Method for calculating the capacity of bus bay

Empirical Characteristics of Transit Travel Time Distribution for Commuting Routes

Heterogeneous platoon flow dispersion model based on truncated mixed simplified phase-type distribution of travel speed: Platoon Flow Dispersion Model Based on TMSPH

A bus stop spacing optimizing model based on discrete distribution demand

Calibration of Platoon Dispersion Parameter Considering the Impact of the Number of Lanes