Expression and diagnostic value of serum free light chain in lung cancer
Xi Xiao,Li Zheng,Hua Zeng,Dan Chen,Liqin Liu,Caimei Dong,Yanping Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230576
2024-06-28
Abstract:Objectives: The expression of serum free light chain (FLC) is abnormal in various diseases, but its role in lung cancer remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the expression and diagnostic value of serum FLC in lung cancer. Methods: A total of 80 lung cancer patients treated at Xiangdong Hospital, Hunan Normal University from January to December 2021 were selected as the lung cancer group. Another 80 healthy individuals undergoing routine physical examinations during the same period were chosen as the control group. General information and serum κFLC and λFLC levels were collected for all subjects. Clinical indicators such as serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) levels, tumor diameter, histological type, TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis status were recorded for lung cancer patients. The expression levels of serum FLC [κFLC, λFLC, and FLC (κ+λ)] were compared between the lung cancer group and the control group. Lung cancer patients were grouped based on gender, age, smoking history, tumor diameter, TNM stage, histological type, and lymph node metastasis to compare differences in serum κFLC and λFLC levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum FLC alone and in combination with other indicators in lung cancer. Results: The expression levels of serum FLC (κ+λ) and κFLC were significantly higher in the lung cancer group than those in the control group (both P<0.001), while there was no significant difference in serum λFLC levels between the 2 groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in serum κFLC levels among lung cancer patients with different tumor diameters, histological types, or TNM stages (all P>0.05); however, serum κFLC levels were higher in lung cancer patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without, with statistical significance (P=0.033). There were no significant differences in serum λFLC levels based on tumor diameter or histological type (both P>0.05), but serum λFLC levels were higher in stage III+IV and lymph node metastatic lung cancer patients compared to stage I+II and non-metastatic patients, with statistical significance (P=0.033 and P=0.019, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) for κFLC and CEA in diagnosing lung cancer showed no significant difference (P=0.333). The combination of κFLC+CYFRA21-1 had the highest diagnostic efficacy (AUC=0.875) and sensitivity (71.3%). The AUC for the combined diagnosis of κFLC+λFLC+CEA+CYFRA21-1 was 0.915 (95% CI 0.860 to 0.953, P<0.001). Conclusions: Serum FLC is highly expressed in lung cancer and is associated with its invasion and metastasis. Serum FLC, particularly κFLC, has diagnostic value for lung cancer, and the combined detection of FLC, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 offers the best diagnostic efficacy.