Sex‐specific recruitment rates contribute to male‐biased sex ratio in Adélie penguins
Virginia Morandini,Katie M. Dugger,Annie E. Schmidt,Arvind Varsani,Amélie Lescroël,Grant Ballard,Phil O'B. Lyver,Kerry Barton,David G. Ainley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10859
IF: 3.167
2024-02-22
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:We detected no survival differences between male and female Adelie penguins, but the probability of recruiting into the breeding population was higher for females. In conjunction with the observed decrease in survival for birds of both sexes once they began to breed, females likely have shorter lifespans than males. These vital rate differences likely contributed to the male‐biased sex ratio we observed in our study. Sex‐related differences in vital rates that drive population change reflect the basic life history of a species. However, for visually monomorphic bird species, determining the effect of sex on demographics can be a challenge. In this study, we investigated the effect of sex on apparent survival, recruitment, and breeding propensity in the Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae), a monochromatic, slightly size dimorphic species with known age, known sex, and known breeding history data collected during 1996–2019 (n = 2127 birds) from three breeding colonies on Ross Island, Antarctica. Using a multistate capture–mark–recapture maximum‐likelihood model, we estimated apparent survival (Ŝ ), recapture (resighting) probability (p^ ), and the probability of transitioning among breeding states and moving between colonies (ψ̂ ; colony‐specific non‐juvenile pre‐breeders, breeders, and non‐breeders). Survival rate varied by breeding status and colony, but not sex, and pre‐breeders had higher survival rates than breeders and non‐breeders. Females had a higher probability of recruiting into the breeding population each year and may enter the breeding pool at younger ages. In contrast, both sexes had the same probability of breeding from year to year once they had recruited. Although we detected no direct sex effects on survival, the variation in recruitment probability and age‐at‐first reproduction, along with lower survival rates of breeders compared to pre‐breeders, likely leads to shorter lifespans for females. This is supported by our findings of a male‐biased mean adult sex ratio (ASR) of 1.4 males for every female (x̂ proportion of males = 0.57, SD = 0.07) across all colonies and years in this metapopulation. Our study illustrates how important it can be to disentangle sex‐related variation in population vital rates, particularly for species with complex life histories and demographic dynamics.
ecology,evolutionary biology