Abstract:Objective: Incompetent perforator veins are encountered frequently during ultrasound assessment of the venous system in chronic venous disease. Some studies have shown that concomitant treatment of truncal and perforator incompetence improves ulcer healing, yet a Cochrane review was unable to determine the potential benefits of perforator surgery in venous ulcer management due to poor quality evidence. This study aims to establish the exact role of concomitant treatment in patients with chronic venous disease. Methods: A search of online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane was performed in March 2022. All studies comparing the outcomes of concomitant superficial venous plus perforator surgery with standard therapy were included. Variables assessed included ulcer healing, time to healing, and ulcer recurrence. Disease severity and quality of life, vein occlusion rates, number of incompetent perforator veins on duplex ultrasound post treatment, and reintervention and complication rates were also analyzed. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Results: Seven studies (872 limbs) were included for analysis. Included studies were of reasonable methodological quality. Ulcer healing rates were similar in each group (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.19; P = .23). Two studies reported no difference in mean time (days) to ulcer healing between groups (mean difference, -14.60; 95% CI, -34.57 to 5.38; P = .15; I2 = 0%; P = .56). Ulcer recurrence was significantly lower in the concomitant group (3.7% vs 44%) (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07- 0.65; P = .007; I2 = 43%; P = .17). Overall, there was no difference in disease severity measured at 12-month follow-up, with a weighted mean difference between groups of -0.88 (95% CI, -2.05 to 0.29; P = .14; I2 = 84%; P = .002). Quality of life was reported in only one study. The total number of perforator veins identified at follow-up duplex ultrasound was significantly lower in the concomitant group (22.4% vs 89%) compared with standard therapy (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.19-0.53; P < .0001; I2 = 88%; P = .0002). There was no difference between groups for occlusion rates of treated great saphenous vein or incompetent perforators (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 0.10-49.74; P = .61). Reported minor (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.63-1.52; P = .92) and thrombotic complications (RR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.59-6.99; P = .26) were similar between groups. Conclusions: Concomitant truncal and perforator surgery is comparable to standard therapy in terms of ulcer healing, safety, and efficacy. Meta-analysis suggests that concomitant treatment could significantly reduce ulcer recurrence rates, but included studies were subject to some biases and short follow-up. Concomitant treatment may be considered to prevent recurrence rather than improve ulcer healing.

Lateral subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery as treatment for lateral perforating vein incompetence and venous ulceration.

SUBFASCIAL ENDOSCOPIC PERFORATOR VEIN SURGERY IN TREATMENT OF VARICOSE OF LOWER LIMB

Combined subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery and endovenous laser treatment without impact on the great saphenous vein for management of lower-extremity varicose veins.

Study of Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery Combined with Endovenous Laser Treatment in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

Combined subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) and Muller's phlebectomy for treatment of varicose vein of lower extremity

Effect Evaluation of Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery Combined with Endovenous Laser Treatment in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

Endovenous laser closure by ultrasound-guided for the treatment of the patients with perforating veins insufifciency

Comparison of two laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization techniques for management of portal hypertension and hypersplenism

The Therapeutic Effect of Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery Combined with Great Saphenous Vein Ligation-stripping for C4 Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Ultrasound-guided endovenous laser ablation for perforator veins insufficiency

The Effect of Endovenous Laser Ablation of Incompetent Perforating Veins and the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients with Primary Venous Disease

Mini-invasive Technique Combined with Surgical Procedure in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency of Lower Limbs

Endovenous laser treatment combined with a surgical strategy for treatment of venous insufficiency in lower extremity: a report of 208 cases.

Combination of Minimally Invasive Methods for the Treatment of Varicose Veins

Combined Endovenous Laser Therapy and Pinhole High Ligation in the Treatment of Symptomatic Great Saphenous Varicose Veins.

Laser ablation of perforator in lower limb venous ulcer

Study of Endoscope in Treatment of Chronic Venous Ulcer in Lower Limb

Comprehensive surgical management in primary venous reflux disease of lower extremity

Endovenous Laser Treatment of Superficial Varicosities of the Lower Limbs(Report of 92 Cases)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of concomitant truncal and perforator surgery

Ten Years, Follow-up of Patients with Lower Limb Venous Ulcers Treated by SEPS