A Randomized Phase Ⅱ Trial of Docetaxel/ Ifosfamide Regimen Versus Single-Agent Docetaxel in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer

CUI Cheng-xu,ZHANG Xiang-ru,ZHU Yun-zhong,YANG Shu-jun,ZHANG Xiang-fu,XU Guang-chuan,HUANG Cheng,LIU Duan-qi,ZHENG Yu-hong,CHU Da-tong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3639.2006.10.021
2006-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:The gold standard in second-line treatment of the advanced non-small-cell lung cancer which has proven activity in a randomized trial remains docetaxel.In this study we evaluated the overall response and side effects of docetaxel-ifosfamide regimen and docetaxel regimen in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods:56 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized in the clinical trial.There were two arms.The patients in T arm received docetaxel single-agent and in TI arm docotaxel-ifosfamide regimen.Results:Only in 23.0% in the T arm and 3% in the TI arm were partial responses observed.Nine patients(34.6%) had stabilized disease in the Tarm and 14 patients(46.7%) in the TI arm.There was no significant statistical difference(P=0.6425).The 1-year survival rates were 21.2% in the T arm and 22.0% in the TI arm.Median survival for the patients in the T arm was(237.0) days and 226.0 days in the TI arm(P=0.0039).Grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ thrombocytopenia was 53.8% in the T arm and(16.7%) in the TI arm(P=0.0056).Grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ neutral leucopenia was 65.4% in the T arm and 33.3% in the TI arm(P=(0.0137)).Conclusions:Non-platinum regimens such as docetaxel-ifosfamide could be used as second line treatment for the patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,they have demonstrated efficacy and safety.There are no significant differences in terms of response rates and survival in docetaxel-ifosfamide doublet and docetaxel single agent.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?